ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
Wingers are a must no matter what formation. We have none.Love all the news, but honestly, Birra and Marcos are two massive players for us to have been able to keep, really impressed with the work that’s been done. Club seems to be doing everything possible to see us build on last year. Which is real ray of sunshine after so many miserable off seasons.
If we can get two quality wingers, I think a 433 would be suited to our squad as it is. Nizz and Ballard sharing the ten role alongside Olly and Stens is a quality midfield.
Recruit an LB, a striker, two wingers, and I think we’d be looking very solid,
4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 would suit the players we’ve got pretty well IMO. Only question there is where are you playing Urena - is he your main striker playing in attack focused wings or do you play him a bit wider or deeper?If we can get two quality wingers, I think a 433 would be suited to our squad as it is. Nizz and Ballard sharing the ten role alongside Olly and Stens is a quality midfield.
Recruit an LB, a striker, two wingers, and I think we’d be looking very solid,
You couldn't play him as the main striker.4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 would suit the players we’ve got pretty well IMO. Only question there is where are you playing Urena - is he your main striker playing in attack focused wings or do you play him a bit wider or deeper?
If it's Ruon we need to revisit the emojis on this forum.More good news coming. COYY.
If RT went from the Socceroos squad to the Olympic training camp it would indicate he has not returned home meaning he arguably has not signed for anyone.
Maybe we will have appointed the coach by then so he can decide
Is that news Monty or a playerMore good news coming. COYY.
It's wombat....... So it's Monty.Is that news Monty or a player
It's wombat....... So it's Monty.
You couldn't play him as the main striker.
If things aren't going well, he goes looking for the ball and does drop back.
I can't really see any coach telling him he can't do that.
So I think you need a main striker and let Urena do what he does.
From the NPL games I have watched Monty principally plays a 4-4-2 system but does sometimes revert to a 4-2-3-1 if the need arises and if the chips are down, he has occasionally tweaked it to a 3-5-2, so he is tactically versatile imho.
On Marco one of the things that really impressed me this year was his support/education of the youngsters.I think he could definitely play 'main striker' depending on how we are looking to attack. I appreciate that he did a great job dropping deep to get on the ball try and help open an attack, but as the season progressed and his fitness lifted he also did excellent work both in direct play counters and really surprised me with his pace and hold up play.
I get your point, but honestly, we could do a hell of lot worse than Marco as the tip of the spear and disagree with SM that we can be sure he needs a formation where he can sit in behind to be effective. Personally, from what he's said and how he played later in the season, I think he wants to get on goal a lot more, and this season was doing what he could and what he had to, to help the team and manage his physical limitations due to late arrival etc. But I think there's every chance as the tip of the spear he could bag 12 plus imo with the right players feeding him.
I thought I knew what kind of striker he was, but as his fitness grew, he changed more and more, making fast breaks, running off the last man, and like any good south American footballer, he seemed to thrive on constant movement, creativity and link play. So again, I think a 433 could be a possibility... But to be truly effective, we'd need need the right wing backs, so they can also get forward to support the wide forwards. Miller can do this I think. Hatch may not have the defensive ability yet... but he can at least definitely do this in attack and get back. And we need two real wingers, though In Casella and Bouman I think we have very decent subs for wide forwards in a 433.
Interesting times.
Pete, Josh and anyone else who's been attending, How has Monty been setting up his academy sides these past two years?
I am not as tactically astute as some on here but I would call the set up this year as 4-2-2-2 (rather than 4-4-2), it has pretty much mirrored the A-League set up, and I had assumed that was deliberate. But he has also changed it to suit the personnel available on the day e.g. 4-2-3-1, and also change it during games when required. So I am also of the opinion that he is tactically versatile.From the NPL games I have watched Monty principally plays a 4-4-2 system but does sometimes revert to a 4-2-3-1 if the need arises and if the chips are down, he has occasionally tweaked it to a 3-5-2, so he is tactically versatile imho.