nebakke
Well-Known Member
Hutch doesnt track back.....he plays just in front of the defence and often plays in line so we have a back 5.
When we're in defence, he still plays in front of the CBs, there's not much difference, I'll give you that, but it's there... More to the point though, he doesn't just stand there and wait for Reddy to do something with the ball.
I think I made the comment somewhere on here after the NS game, that I noted Tesco, screaming his head off at Reddy several times, for preferring to kick the ball long when Tesco was right there, waiting... That day, everyone else moved high for some reason...
On Friday, Zac and Bosnar were shut down almost straight away whenever they actually did ask for the ball, if they didn't have a man straight on them, he was on them the second the ball was passed, leading to the ping-ponging between Ando and Reddy, we needed someone to come down and offer another option, Hutch would've done that.
Do you think we would have won with hutcho playing??????? LOL
Our midfield was outclassed and our movement is non existent......both consistent with every game Hutch plays.
Having said that Monty was shite.
Don't be obtuse, you can make improvements to our performance on Friday without it being the thing that makes the difference... There was more than one thing wrong, if you reckon you could fix that game with a single change on our side, I'd be very interested to hear what it is. If anything, this game proves that you can't blame Hutch for all of the mistakes and/or bad things that have happened during this season.
Personally, I'm leaning towards that idea of returning to something akin to the 4-4-2 with two DMs... Maybe have Hutch and Caceres swap at around 50/60 - Caceres with fresh legs and less swamped might work well.
It means though, that there's a hella-lotta-work for Fitz and Bernie potentially, but it also acknowledges that we don't have a #10, so let's see how we go without and maybe instead send Duke and Matty up the front...