Jaza_SFC
Well-Known Member
Wombat said:Caceres, is by all accounts a vastly superior player and according to a friend of mine who is a Victory member (and an ex NSL player himself) he was a crowd favourite and it was not popular decision that Merrick sold him.
I'd say Caceres is even more inconsistent than Kwasnik. Caceres has games where he's amazingly deadly, he also has games where he disappears. 90% of games he does play, he's finished my the 60min mark so you always need to have a sub ready for him. As a coach, that would be annoying.
Wombat said:Apparently he was viewed as not a good tackler.
Caceres is very poor at tracking back, yes. But the main reason he left MVFC was because they refused to guarantee him gametime, did not think he warranted the payrise he asked for, and Merrick was annoyed at his inconsistency.
Caceres is a good signing *IF* Lawrie and co can get that consistency in to him and get him to pick up his defensive skills a bit. If not, for the money paid, he will be a waste.
Wombat said:I'd keep Kwassie in the squad but I wouldn't be bothered if he left or not.
Fair call, but I think those people automatically assuming that the players you have signed are vast upgrades on Kwasnik have another thing coming. Especially when you put the cap figues in place.