• Join ccmfans.net

    ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!

    If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.

    ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.

Hall of Fame

Ancient Mariner

Well-Known Member
I love the idea of 2 levels.

Legend should be a very, very, very exclusive club, with perhaps one person being inducted per year... max.

I've been reading some selection criteria for various HoF's in other sports. Basically, there doesn't seen to be any hard & fast criteria a person should meet. People are nominated and a vote takes place. Fans do the nominating and a board of (usually) journos do the selecting.

That raises the question of what our process should be. Should we open up the nominating to everyone but only a select group of people do the final selection?.... or we just open it up to a general vote and whoever gets the most votes gets inducted?

My preference (at this stage) would be to form a HoF board, consisting of about 10 CCMfans.net members, a few YA active members, some media, like Mike Kmet and Ray Gatt (and others) and a couple of club reps. All nominees are put up for consideration by the board and the board decided on an annual intake of 5 (or so) inductees.

What do you think?

Journos, CCMfans.net members?

You've got to be kidding.

And it is Mick not Mike.
 

Ancient Mariner

Well-Known Member
I call him Mike.

No, I'm not kidding. I'm just throwing ideas out there. I'd appreciate constructive criticism in return.

You'd be the only one.

If you get ten members from this forum you would have five votes for Matty Simon, four for Glinch, and one for Gumpy.

The majority here would not have seen a game in V1.

If you want the criticism to be constructive, here it is:

Wait until the club is at least 20 years old before even suggesting a Hall of fame.
 

Atomic

Well-Known Member
You underestimate your fellow forumites. Sad really.

Not a fan of a HoF? Fair enough, your opinion has been noted.
 

Atomic

Well-Known Member
Back to the question of nomination and voting... any other thoughts on my previous post?
That raises the question of what our process should be. Should we open up the nominating to everyone but only a select group of people do the final selection?.... or we just open it up to a general vote and whoever gets the most votes gets inducted?

My preference (at this stage) would be to form a HoF board, consisting of about 10 CCMfans.net members, a few YA active members, some media, like Michael Kmet (thanks AM) and Ray Gatt (and others) and a couple of club reps. All nominees are put up for consideration by the board and the board decided on an annual intake of 5 (or so) inductees.

I'd love to hear alternative models
 

universalmind

Well-Known Member
I agree with AM. IMO a hall of fame inductee needs to be someone who has proven to bleed yellow. Only one person comes close and at this point and even then wouldn't be guaranteed. Lets make inductees really strive for this. Gumps, Mile, Glinch, Ryan and Wilko should all be commended for their service, however as history has shown have jumped at the opportunity to further careers/earn better coin elsewhere. Although they may have an affection for the club, their pursuit of other glories rules them out of legendary status here (at least until they decide to return). 10yrs service to the club is a minimum.
 

bikinigirl

Well-Known Member
I agree with AM. IMO a hall of fame inductee needs to be someone who has proven to bleed yellow. Only one person comes close and at this point and even then wouldn't be guaranteed. Lets make inductees really strive for this. Gumps, Mile, Glinch, Ryan and Wilko should all be commended for their service, however as history has shown have jumped at the opportunity to further careers/earn better coin elsewhere. Although they may have an affection for the club, their pursuit of other glories rules them out of legendary status here (at least until they decide to return). 10yrs service to the club is a minimum.

. in reality that is too harsh as far as i am concerned ... you will be lucky to ever have anybody inducted ... and if you do it may only be because they simply weren't good enough at their job to achieve more

. just out of interest ... who is your only person that comes close?
... based on the criteria being set my guess would be browny
 

bikinigirl

Well-Known Member
Not a popular answer on here for whatever reason but Hutch would surely be the prime candidate.

. and therein lies the conundrum:
  • most appearances
  • captain of inaugural championship side
  • 10 years service next year (first and only player)
  • but not exactly a crowd favourite
  • not the most talented player
  • and had a loan spell in china
  • which would have tested his 'loyalty' had he received the permanent transfer that many believe was the reason for the 'loan spell'
 

pjennings

Well-Known Member
I do not believe that people coming to CCM know that we sell OS. I would not discount on the grounds of loyalty for people going OS - only to other HAL clubs.
 

universalmind

Well-Known Member
. in reality that is too harsh as far as i am concerned ... you will be lucky to ever have anybody inducted ... and if you do it may only be because they simply weren't good enough at their job to achieve more

. just out of interest ... who is your only person that comes close?
... based on the criteria being set my guess would be browny

possibly too harsh, but my point being adding someone every year from now on when we are barely 10 year old discredits the achievement. This was a suggestion above.

Person i had in mind was John Hutchinson. However had completely overlooked Browny. Another potential candidate.

The point re moving OS v HAL club - i have no animosity to those who further their career overseas to greener pastures and actively follow their careers as a proud fan of CCM, however IMO those greener pastures come at a cost. That cost being hall of fame status.
 

bikinigirl

Well-Known Member
Person i had in mind was John Hutchinson. However had completely overlooked Browny. Another potential candidate.

;) ... i kinda figured hutch was the one you had in mind - which is why is suggested browny considering all the criteria mentioned in here (me being not one to stir or anything)
 

Online statistics

Members online
36
Guests online
667
Total visitors
703

Forum statistics

Threads
6,829
Messages
400,523
Members
2,785
Latest member
TimothyBrell
Top