ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
Foriegnmariner said:Is there any possible way this ban could of been A-League only in the first place?
Is that possible/legal?
If so, Danny could of got an 8 week ban and would of saved FIFA/FFA/CCM alot of time, hassle and money.
Andy said:Am I the only person that finds it hilarious that both Scum and Sydney fans are happy about this decision even though it doesn't benefit them in anyway. Expecially since it actually disadvantages them because he will play against them in the first two rounds.
Andy said:Am I the only person that finds it hilarious that both Scum and Sydney fans are happy about this decision even though it doesn't benefit them in anyway. Expecially since it actually disadvantages them because he will play against them in the first two rounds.
could have been much worse presents imhomarconigirl said:I heard this on the news yesterday and it completely ruined my birthday..
Worst birthday present ever...
i was saying there was no judiciary hearing! Hence FIFA cant make one up- and hence cant interfere- if there was a hearing then maybe they could have???Andy said:Kareem said:FIFA did 100% right...and I thought they might step in because it was absolutely ludicrous (the gap inbetween the ban).
FFA are to blame....
On the topic of why Griffiths case wasnt examined by Fifa was that there was no case...they was no judicary and no punishment- hence FIFA didnt have the oppurtunity to do anything about it...
Can someone please tell me why FFA couldnt have given a 'x' matches suspension in HAL??? I thought that was the standard punishment in other leagues...if it was macthes instead of months it would have been more logical and sensible!
There was a judicial system in place at the time.
The reason it oculdn't have been dealt with is because the c*nt had been yellow carded by the referee, meaning his punishment had been dealt and FFA couldn't intervene. It sucks, but the rules are rules.
I didnt say they changed the sentence???graaant said:El Kareemo, thanks for reinforcing your knowledge for us all. But you should also know that FIFA did not change any sentence, regardless of whether or not it was matches, or dates.
FIFA came in and said "Buckley, you're a dick, this gap is stupid" and reinstated the original 12 MONTH ban.
And that's that.
jeez, when will you leavethomas477 said:jeez, when will it end
jaypee said:The real villain is Shields who lost it completely and sent him off for what Milligan was allowed to get away with.