clarence
Well-Known Member
dibo said:UnitedsNo9 said:Exactly, sexuality is irrelavent wombat. Obviously these players are being trialled and if they arent up to grade then wont be signed. I find it a positive that we are trialling half a dozen players, if a few of them are the hard men or creative men we need then its a step in the right direction.
agree with youFFC Mariner said:dibo said:it doesn't have anything to do with homosexuality. my point was i don't care if they're flagrantly heterosexual either. it's irrelevant. i just want good footballers.
The point I utterly failed to make..........seemed a good idea at the time.
and i know where you're coming from, all good,clarence said:FFC Mariner said:dibo said:it doesn't have anything to do with homosexuality. my point was i don't care if they're flagrantly heterosexual either. it's irrelevant. i just want good footballers.
The point I utterly failed to make..........seemed a good idea at the time.
Statistically, there's a chance that there is already at least 1 gay footballer in our squad. But that's not the point.
Couldn't care if a player was a goat masturbator from Taliban controlled Afghanistan, if they can play football better than the players we currently have, we need them (oh, and if he can leave the local goats alone for a full season ;D ).
and i agree with you too.
actually, given we've had somewhere in the order of 40 players pass through the squad if we count short-termers and all that, we probably have or have had about 4 players who aren't strictly heterosexual. and i couldn't give a flying f**k, they can chase romance wherever they like, so long as they don't break the law and they don't scare the horses (to paraphrase someone whose name i can't remember).
You know how we get told sometimes that the forum is read by the players?
Imagine the looks at each other in their communal shower the next time at training after they've read this - no one will be game to drop the soap! Bet Kwassi does a goat bleat and has everyone in stitches. ;D