I think I'm in the minority but I really didn't think we were that bad. We've played a lot worse in the past to eke out nil all draws or 1 nil wins. Adelaide were just a little bit harder at the ball which you would expect after all the drama the day before, coming off no wins in seven? games and playing at home. A win on thursday and we are back up to fourth within touching distance of second.
You might be, but for the greater part, I'm actually with you... I suppose that goes to show what I know about football, but still
Looking at it realistically, there are always going to be obvious chances that are missed, but if you look at the really obvious ones that would normally be put away, even by us, this would've at least been a tie... And here I'm talking about the ones that are entirely down to poor play on our behalf, not the ones where the goalie had an extraordinary save or their defenders did great work... It's been some days now, but off the top of my head, I think there's two to Macca, Two (?) to Matty and then that bl**dy bad luck for Mile... I think WeeMac missed a sitter as well and on it goes, so at this point, in normal terms, if we'd missed 50% of the sitters, we're still in the game.
So I think, before anyone get carried away by how great Adelaide were and how we fell apart, I think it's worth bearing in mind that bad games happen to every team and our boys have never been great at actually hitting the target.
On Reddy, I actually didn't think he had too bad a game either, except for that one brain snap - I have to admit, I feel more comfortable with him in goal than I do Pasfield... Tbf Pasfield has a history of looking shaky, going back two years and he's gotten a lot better, but it's hard to shake.
Seip though... Christ! Hot then cold... I actually thought he did alright in Roux's place a couple of weeks back, I know I'm in the minority there as well, but I thought he seemed a lot happier and a lot more comfortable, being allowed to make the occasional run forward... No doubt he was also good in defense against Sydney, but I don't see much justification for replacing Griff2 with him... I wouldn't want to place the defeat at his feet, I don't think that'd be fair, but I can't help wonder if the situation wouldn't have been different with Griff2 in there in Adelaide... It was clear that Seip wasn't at his best I thought.
EDIT: Oh and yes, if anything I think perhaps we've shown more hope and composure since Mossie took over, which is a positive.