FFC Mariner
Well-Known Member
Most other AL clubs except Perth and Scum could easily pay him a bigger wage.
ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
Thats on Peil then. All those players should have attracted top dollar. If we're taking unders for the sake of sell ons or good relations, thats pretty stupid.We've been told the fees on all those players were much less than people expect and the club is running in the red constantly. Any time we hear from Peil is to tell us about how the club is struggling financially.
cutting off your nose to spite your faceconspiracy theory
maybe Peil is crying poor so often to lower the overall value of the club making it easier for him to purchase at the end of the current arrangement
Still baffles me how we went from Mike saying he needed to put in $1m a season, when we had no crowds and no transfer fee revenue, and now he have healthy crowds, healthy transfer stream whatever you believe about the actual amounts and other unplanned revenue such as the WC bonuses and yet we are supposedly losing more than ever despite only a seemingly small uplift in salary cap and back office expenditureconspiracy theory
maybe Peil is crying poor so often to lower the overall value of the club making it easier for him to purchase at the end of the current arrangement
cause the club is funding things properly now. well maybe not properly but alot better. that is a significant uptick in costStill baffles me how we went from Mike saying he needed to put in $1m a season, when we had no crowds and no transfer fee revenue, and now he have healthy crowds, healthy transfer stream whatever you believe about the actual amounts and other unplanned revenue such as the WC bonuses and yet we are supposedly losing more than ever despite only a seemingly small uplift in salary cap and back office expenditure
This.cause the club is funding things properly now. well maybe not properly but alot better. that is a significant uptick in cost
I'm sure Peil at some point last year said the funding increase was in the order of 3-4m a year. Huge if actually true.This.
Mike starved the club whereas our Dick is at least funding a professional outfit.
Funding what properly though - where are we investing extra? Genuine question if you have info on this, if you have insight, on where the money has been invested not a challenge.cause the club is funding things properly now. well maybe not properly but alot better. that is a significant uptick in cost
couldnt tell you. just going by Peil.Funding what properly though - where are we investing extra? Genuine question if you have info on this, if you have insight, on where the money has been invested not a challenge.
As far as I know we went from paying the salary cap floor to the salary cap - about $250k difference. There may have been an uplift in back office staff but mostly they still seem to be understaffed and overworked.
There are plenty of little things like proper ice baths and new gym gear that add up but I don't see anything that in total wouldn't be covered by one of the transfer fees
Solidarity fees are a maximum of 5% of the fee (and some of that would be coming due to us anyway).couldnt tell you. just going by Peil.
Consider even if we get decent fees, the losses to agents, solidarity payments, training fees to all clubs involved with players development, sell ons, players cut. all these are things that could result in the club losing bulk amounts of the fees. all the more reason we need to maximise the initial fee, rather rely on sell ons. Reality is we've probs received more in fees from solidarity/training fees than sell ons.
Gym gear donated by England's women team after world cup apparently.Funding what properly though - where are we investing extra? Genuine question if you have info on this, if you have insight, on where the money has been invested not a challenge.
As far as I know we went from paying the salary cap floor to the salary cap - about $250k difference. There may have been an uplift in back office staff but mostly they still seem to be understaffed and overworked.
There are plenty of little things like proper ice baths and new gym gear that add up but I don't see anything that in total wouldn't be covered by one of the transfer fees
Agree in theory but I think the investment would be too great, even if we could get some government grants. It would also turn CCS into a tenant-less white elephant so the council would sell it off for residential units. So there would be no stadium available for the big games.TBH I suspect the only way we can be sustainable on an ongoing basis is for very substantial investment at Tuggerah for a small boutique ground (5000-10,000) and clubhouse.
As much as I like the stadium it is simply draining resources with little upside without a big crowd. If we only played, SFC, WSW, Scum and NYE at the stadium where a return could be made - then the remainder at smaller ground Tuggerah with a clubhouse attached then a year on year costs would be substantially less.
Apparently Mike retains Tuggerah currently and Richard is funding the club. How that sort of arrangement for a small ground and clubhouse would work I'm not sure.
Then as an anchor tenant we should get a better deal.Agree in theory but I think the investment would be too great, even if we could get some government grants. It would also turn CCS into a tenant-less white elephant so the council would sell it off for residential units. So there would be no stadium available for the big games.
The council own CCS. They are all NRL fans and have consistently done nothing for CCM.Over the years a number of well connected folk told me the stadium was controlled by some RL dinosaurs who wanted a RL team there and had a dream of the Northern Eagles returning or a Sydney team moving up.
Current stadium rights holders in Venues NSW are showing no feel for Football, look at Newcastle's game and we have multi league games in and around some of our key matches.
Whether it would work or not, but a 10K stadium at the COE is only 12 to 15 rows, and if steep only needs a small roof.... throw in all food and drink sales ... plus a small club... can only dream...
Honestly, how that arrangement works at all is mind boggling. At the time it seemed like a way for Mike to keep sucking money out of the club, and now... well, still the same story.Apparently Mike retains Tuggerah currently and Richard is funding the club. How that sort of arrangement for a small ground and clubhouse would work I'm not sure.
I had my first trip to No 2 Sportsground when the ladies played the Jets, and its a very tidy little facility. It cost around $7.5m but thats around 12 years ago. With inflation I reckon it would be $10m for something similar today.Whether it would work or not, but a 10K stadium at the COE is only 12 to 15 rows, and if steep only needs a small roof.... throw in all food and drink sales ... plus a small club... can only dream...