• Join ccmfans.net

    ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!

    If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.

    ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.

Mariners Squad 2023/2024

some guy

Active Member
Clubs don't set them. Players agents do.
All contracts do is make sure you do get a fee and set out wages etc.
As a means of tying someone to an employer they dont do that.
Anyone can get out of a contract. Ask a contractor
They have to be agreed, though. Bad business if we’re just blindly agreeing to any proposed release clauses our players’ agents propose.
 

Huddo

Well-Known Member
How do you advance the club if your getting cents to the dollar on quality players, disrupting your playing group midseason, probably affecting their final position, which will obviously have an effect on membership numbers next year, meaning it becomes harder to sign quality players.

It seems like a negative loop.
 
Last edited:

Huddo

Well-Known Member
Ironic that people think workers rights that they enjoy shouldn't apply to footballers.

What are you talking about?

These are contracted workers, not employees.

Most of the issues in the workforce ( in the Gig economy) have be created by contracted workers in the employment workforce. My point is the rights don't exist for things like sick leave and long service for contracted workers because there's a contract involved between 2 parties, it's not an employee/employer relationship.

Besides, even employees can have seperation clauses stipulating where they can work after they leave.

Do you understand basic IR law?
 
Last edited:

turbo

Well-Known Member
Clubs don't set them. Players agents do.
All contracts do is make sure you do get a fee and set out wages etc.
As a means of tying someone to an employer they dont do that.
Anyone can get out of a contract. Ask a contractor
If the player wants it hypothetically set at 300k what do you do? You don’t have to move forward with the deal. We’re seeing decent moves from the A league of late but if we set releases or take deals for unders we’re setting ourselves up to need to sell more players for the same amount. It’s poor business
 

crock

Well-Known Member
I would imagine we would find out today if there is any truth or not if he gets named in team
 

Huddo

Well-Known Member
You can't play for 2 clubs at the same time.

It's not like a wedding photographer who can contract to provide their services to multiple entities at the same time.

You can't because the contract stipulates you can't in the players obligations.

Standard contract.


Under Players Obligations, Point 4.1(a).

EDIT: there may be rules from the governing body that state this also, but this contract is to ensure the club gets what it paid for.
 
Last edited:

Huddo

Well-Known Member
My government contract wouldn't be able to stipulate that I can't leave for a private company if an offer came and I wanted to accept.

Otherwise nobody would ever be able to leave for the private sector.

If you ability is specialised, it can be written in to a contract.

EXAMPLE: Say you were trained up on a specific piece of equipment to assist a contractor/employer with a an extremely specific job, they could have written into your contract that if you were to seperate that specified job is not to be practiced, or an exclusion zone on for where it would be practiced to ensure the contractors/Employers business was protected.

EDIT: it doesn't even have to be that specialised, my missus was barred from selling jewellery on the Peninsula for 6 months after she left a jewellery retail job, because it was written in to her contract.
 
Last edited:

Stuartmcateer

Well-Known Member
If you ability is specialised, it can be written in to a contract.

EXAMPLE: Say you were trained up on a specific piece of equipment to assist a contractor/employer with a an extremely specific job, they could have written into your contract that if you were to seperate that specified job is not to be practiced, or an exclusion zone on for where it would be practiced to ensure the contractors/Employers business was protected.
But that's not what you are talking about when you say it should be written into the contract that we won't sell to a second tier club.

There's no proprietary information or skills and nor is there an infringement on the CCM business in Australia by selling to a K2 club.
 

Corsair

Well-Known Member
It's an agreement between 2 parties.

You wouldn't be able to have in your work contract that you can't go to this or that if an offer came in
Of course you can, I've had these clauses in contracts before. Usually time limits, i.e. can't work for a direct competitor for x period after contract terminates. Whether they are enforceable is a different matter.
 

turbo

Well-Known Member
EDIT: it doesn't even have to be that specialised, my missus was barred from selling jewellery on the Peninsula for 6 months after she left a jewellery retail job, because it was written in to her contract.
That sort of thing can be contested, or ignored and contested if the employer bothers to sue. The contract can say anything it wants but wont necessarily be enforceable. And typically there's provisions like gardening leave required to make it enforceable.

But that's not what you are talking about when you say it should be written into the contract that we won't sell to a second tier club.
There's 2 separate things happening here, I agree you can't do that example and be selective where they go. But at the same time if we had to agree to any release under Aus law we'll never get anywhere as a selling league.
 

Huddo

Well-Known Member
That sort of thing can be contested, or ignored and contested if the employer bothers to sue. The contract can say anything it wants but wont necessarily be enforceable. And typically there's provisions like gardening leave required to make it enforceable.


There's 2 separate things happening here, I agree you can't do that example and be selective where they go. But at the same time if we had to agree to any release under Aus law we'll never get anywhere as a selling league.

Yeah, I said the same thing to the misso, and she wasnt worried. My point is it was written in, which means there is a point of contention, and a position the employer was taking, contested or not my missus knew her previous employer ( current at the time) wouldn't be happy with a lateral move.
 
Last edited:

Ironbark

Well-Known Member
At the end of the day I don't think this is a good move for Torres.

A season here carving it up the way Tulio did and J1 or equivalent becomes an option. He could disappear into the cracks at Suwon and stall the career.

Standing out in the A-League is a better shop window than being mediocre in a second tier league, even if it's higher quality, imo.

Hope Jacko is telling him the same
 

Online statistics

Members online
20
Guests online
311
Total visitors
331

Forum statistics

Threads
6,793
Messages
396,048
Members
2,746
Latest member
Brandnwreta
Top