clarence
Well-Known Member
Bladesman said:Jedinak and Simon are great examples of how a contract in sport should work. You work hard to get one (Jedinak played for free for a few months), you recieve a contract, you continue to work hard and put in, recieve a upgraded contract as a reward for you performance, if you continue to work and perform you move on to greater things such as Europe or an international call up and get rewarded with a uograded contact.
Sorry I tend to disagree with the trail for free situation, even in sport.
The players view themselves as professionals, and they should be paid to trial over an extended period or if they are travelling to get to the trial.
It is a situation the club's can exploit - players would be reluctant to trial for other clubs in the same comp. while they were under trial with one club, and then they could get lead down the garden path before eventually being told they were not required.
Anyone who has kids just starting work will be aware of the Howard's Govt. leniency under their workplace laws that allowed employers to trial people - or at least the Govt. wasn't keen to stamp it out if it was an illegal practice.
I understand the frustration about Nik's contract extension, the fact he played so little and still managed to snap up an extension does point to a weakness in the contract negotiations and I suspect that's an area the Mariners may tighten up on in future after reading all of us groaning about the oxygen thief's good luck. Strangely, the Mariners also struck trouble with Gumps the season before last and some of that argument was over the Mariners not taking up an option to extend his contract.