pjennings said:Substitutes 6. Anthony Villazon, 9. Nathan Moseley, 10. Nathan Ralph, 11. Damien Brown, 13. Nathan Sherlock, 16. Brady Smith, 17. Ben Glachan
So which one of them was the confident back in #12?
ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
pjennings said:Substitutes 6. Anthony Villazon, 9. Nathan Moseley, 10. Nathan Ralph, 11. Damien Brown, 13. Nathan Sherlock, 16. Brady Smith, 17. Ben Glachan
~Floss~ said:pjennings said:Substitutes 6. Anthony Villazon, 9. Nathan Moseley, 10. Nathan Ralph, 11. Damien Brown, 13. Nathan Sherlock, 16. Brady Smith, 17. Ben Glachan
So which one of them was the confident back in #12?
almost retired said:Koelma's a red-head....was #12 ?
Greenpoleffc said:~Floss~ said:pjennings said:Substitutes 6. Anthony Villazon, 9. Nathan Moseley, 10. Nathan Ralph, 11. Damien Brown, 13. Nathan Sherlock, 16. Brady Smith, 17. Ben Glachan
So which one of them was the confident back in #12?
The No12 looked v assured didnt he?? So is he Koelma??
~Floss~ said:But #12 (whever he was) and D'Apuzzo were the 2 triallists who looked most likely to have potential for HAL level IMO
pjennings said:From CCM site
Central Coast Mariners 1. Matthew Trott (gk), 2. David DApuzzo, 4. Ian McAndrew, 5. Bradley Porter, 7. John Hutchinson, 15. Andrew Clark, 18. Alex Wilkinson, 19. Adam Kwasnik, 21. Ahmad Elrich, 22. Sasho Petrovski, 27. Dylan Macallister
Substitutes 6. Anthony Villazon, 9. Nathan Moseley, 10. Nathan Ralph, 11. Damien Brown, 13. Nathan Sherlock, 16. Brady Smith, 17. Ben Glachan
Central Coast Lightning 18. Troy Ward (gk), 4. Jamie Lobb, 5. Matt Wilkinson, 6. Luke Walker, 7. Nathan Moseley, 9. Paul McGinley, 12. Xavier Forsberg, 14. Darren Cooper, 15. Neil Woodcock, 16. Keenan Crumm, 24. Brady Smith
Substitutes 1. Mitchell Stubbs (gk), 3. Tony Cornwall, 20. Mitch Harper, 23. Josh Hall, 30. Eric Koelma, 31. Scott McGinley, 33. Luke McWaide
Torres said:pjennings said:From CCM site
Central Coast Mariners 1. Matthew Trott (gk), 2. David DApuzzo, 4. Ian McAndrew, 5. Bradley Porter, 7. John Hutchinson, 15. Andrew Clark, 18. Alex Wilkinson, 19. Adam Kwasnik, 21. Ahmad Elrich, 22. Sasho Petrovski, 27. Dylan Macallister
Substitutes 6. Anthony Villazon, 9. Nathan Moseley, 10. Nathan Ralph, 11. Damien Brown, 13. Nathan Sherlock, 16. Brady Smith, 17. Ben Glachan
Central Coast Lightning 18. Troy Ward (gk), 4. Jamie Lobb, 5. Matt Wilkinson, 6. Luke Walker, 7. Nathan Moseley, 9. Paul McGinley, 12. Xavier Forsberg, 14. Darren Cooper, 15. Neil Woodcock, 16. Keenan Crumm, 24. Brady Smith
Substitutes 1. Mitchell Stubbs (gk), 3. Tony Cornwall, 20. Mitch Harper, 23. Josh Hall, 30. Eric Koelma, 31. Scott McGinley, 33. Luke McWaide
So Nathan Moseley played in both teams? Was he cloned or something?
20. Mitch Harper IMO looked quite troubling a couple of times for the Mariners defence.
At the age of 17 (I think) he could potentially be a future Mariner.