• Join ccmfans.net

    ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!

    If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.

    ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.

CCM v Bogans 14th Jan

awaba

Well-Known Member
the swearing concerns are a little overdone IMO. You can't expect a supporter group to magically conjure up smart and funny chants without engaging in some profanity along the way. Give them some time to work up to a good range of songs and banter. Clamping down will only put a downer on the whole thing.

as for "won't somebody think of the children" ... geez kids hear and engage in worse every day at school. If anything it'll probably help attract more kids to join in the active support.

They'll grow out of the more obvious chants if they're given the time to build the home end up a bit.
 

curious

Well-Known Member
the swearing concerns are a little overdone IMO. You can't expect a supporter group to magically conjure up smart and funny chants without engaging in some profanity along the way. Give them some time to work up to a good range of songs and banter. Clamping down will only put a downer on the whole thing.

as for "won't somebody think of the children" ... geez kids hear and engage in worse every day at school. If anything it'll probably help attract more kids to join in the active support.

They'll grow out of the more obvious chants if they're given the time to build the home end up a bit.


I often hear that explanation but not yet aware of school kids in very large groups at school repetitively chanting offensive language in unison at the top of their voices.
 

adz

Moderator
Staff member
This issue has popped up every now and then since day 1 and I doubt anything is ever going to change. I think it's funny that some people are suggesting number of people in bay 16 is inversely proportional to the amount of swearing...

bay16swearing.jpg
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
I was amused to read in the facebook thread someone equating swearing with hooliganism. Heaven help these people if they ever actually saw real hooliganism, and thankfully they're unlikely to anywhere in this country.

I also laugh at the 'sinking to their level' comments with respect to the Newcastle supporters. On numbers alone, they've got it all over us. The numbers bring noise and atmosphere, and that's a good thing. They also bring a smattering of dickheads and all credit to Furns and a couple of other key guys up there - they've worked pretty hard to minimise that, including working in consultation with security and police and their club to try to keep it nice.

In a few ways I'd rather be in their position, with a number of dickheads to weed out but big numbers, than where we are - rebuilding what was a fractured and depleted supporter base.

I think there are more offensive things than swearing too. Some songs that have been sung over the years were beyond the pale and aren't sung anymore, but an F-bomb ain't gonna kill anyone.

There's a simple reason why swearing happens in songs - the people who sing them tend to be young men, most of whom (like me) tend to drop a few choice words from time to time. I swear, I tend to do it as an exclamation or for emphasis. I don't swear in place of punctuation as some do, but frankly I don't think it's a huge issue.

There are people I swear around and there are people I don't. My grandmother, my in-laws and my extended family generally don't get the pleasure of my bon mots, but it's not at all uncommon in my workplace or in businesses and other organisations I deal with. In short, they're everyday words - though I tend not to say c**t all that often.

If I walk down the street, on the football field, near school grounds or whatever (there's a primary school on the corner of my street) I hear plenty, and plenty of people are more comfortable saying c**t than I am. We can't pretend that people in the ground haven't heard these words.

If people find it distasteful, treat it the same way as hearing someone in the street, on the train, wherever else you might happen to be. Tell your kids that some people use those words, you prefer not to and that they aren't to. Teach them about context - people will exclaim words they won't otherwise use.

Consequently, saying shit or f**k in a chant is not something that bothers me. I think there's a fair degree of censorship going on already in that there are things that people won't sing and the group won't support, but to ask a group to not sing words which are used in everyday conversation is just odd. People might get the shits at the language, but they also get the shits when we're not making enough noise to entertain them. They'll actively complain about one of them, but the other one is just as likely to result in them not coming to the game.

Face it - if it's a dire 0-0 draw where we're plugging away and getting nowhere because the other team's popped 10 behind the ball, I'd rather we be moderately entertaining and interesting for the 9/10 people who couldn't give a flying f**k if we sear than be tame (and small, and quiet) for the 1/10 that might have a problem.

And I'd be enormously surprised if it's as many as 1/10 have a problem. The 9/10 will at least be able to say that they enjoyed the atmosphere even if the game was dire, but I'd rather 1/10 complain about swearing than 10/10 saying "isn't it a shame we can't hear the supporters".
 

priorpeter

Well-Known Member
Swearing in Bay 16... stop the press.
It has happened before and it will happen again. You'll hear it anywhere you go and I strongly agree that it's no worse than kids will hear in the schoolyard, or when they're watching an episode of South Park etc. Most kids know that what happens at the game, stays at the game. A bit of swearing is certainly not driving anyone away from The Bay en masse. Don't pretend you didn't hear the squadron swearing.

In saying this - in the street after the game, there were a group chanting. I was leading said group. There was no swearing whatsoever. The reason lies in what I mentioned - what happens at the game, stays at the game.

As for the fight - did not involve regulars. Was the Umina Rugby League first grade squad and to be honest they probably brought it on themselves, from what I could see. They tried to start on a few of us outside after the game, completely unprovoked. I agree it's not a good look but it's also not exactly a regular occurrence and TBH I don't expect to see them back for a while, in the Bay at least.

As for the game - meh. Disappointed. Pretty woeful first half. Hearfield :headbutt:
Let's move on, nothing to see here.
 

priorpeter

Well-Known Member
I was amused to read in the facebook thread someone equating swearing with hooliganism. Heaven help these people if they ever actually saw real hooliganism, and thankfully they're unlikely to anywhere in this country.

I also laugh at the 'sinking to their level' comments with respect to the Newcastle supporters. On numbers alone, they've got it all over us. The numbers bring noise and atmosphere, and that's a good thing. They also bring a smattering of dickheads and all credit to Furns and a couple of other key guys up there - they've worked pretty hard to minimise that, including working in consultation with security and police and their club to try to keep it nice.

In a few ways I'd rather be in their position, with a number of dickheads to weed out but big numbers, than where we are - rebuilding what was a fractured and depleted supporter base.

I think there are more offensive things than swearing too. Some songs that have been sung over the years were beyond the pale and aren't sung anymore, but an F-bomb ain't gonna kill anyone.

There's a simple reason why swearing happens in songs - the people who sing them tend to be young men, most of whom (like me) tend to drop a few choice words from time to time. I swear, I tend to do it as an exclamation or for emphasis. I don't swear in place of punctuation as some do, but frankly I don't think it's a huge issue.

There are people I swear around and there are people I don't. My grandmother, my in-laws and my extended family generally don't get the pleasure of my bon mots, but it's not at all uncommon in my workplace or in businesses and other organisations I deal with. In short, they're everyday words - though I tend not to say c**t all that often.

If I walk down the street, on the football field, near school grounds or whatever (there's a primary school on the corner of my street) I hear plenty, and plenty of people are more comfortable saying c**t than I am. We can't pretend that people in the ground haven't heard these words.

If people find it distasteful, treat it the same way as hearing someone in the street, on the train, wherever else you might happen to be. Tell your kids that some people use those words, you prefer not to and that they aren't to. Teach them about context - people will exclaim words they won't otherwise use.

Consequently, saying shit or f**k in a chant is not something that bothers me. I think there's a fair degree of censorship going on already in that there are things that people won't sing and the group won't support, but to ask a group to not sing words which are used in everyday conversation is just odd. People might get the shits at the language, but they also get the shits when we're not making enough noise to entertain them. They'll actively complain about one of them, but the other one is just as likely to result in them not coming to the game.

Face it - if it's a dire 0-0 draw where we're plugging away and getting nowhere because the other team's popped 10 behind the ball, I'd rather we be moderately entertaining and interesting for the 9/10 people who couldn't give a flying f**k if we sear than be tame (and small, and quiet) for the 1/10 that might have a problem.

And I'd be enormously surprised if it's as many as 1/10 have a problem. The 9/10 will at least be able to say that they enjoyed the atmosphere even if the game was dire, but I'd rather 1/10 complain about swearing than 10/10 saying "isn't it a shame we can't hear the supporters".

^This. /thread
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
This issue has popped up every now and then since day 1 and I doubt anything is ever going to change. I think it's funny that some people are suggesting number of people in bay 16 is inversely proportional to the amount of swearing...

bay16swearing.jpg

I'm laughing with you there Adz, because those of us who've been at this (or around, given that I've bailed on the last couple of years in the Bay) for 7 seasons know why that is a fallacy.
 

adz

Moderator
Staff member
I'm laughing with you there Adz, because those of us who've been at this (or around, given that I've bailed on the last couple of years in the Bay) for 7 seasons know why that is a fallacy.

Yup, swearing was a pretty hot topic just about every week in the early seasons, but the bay was always packed and you could hardly move in it...
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
I remember I raised issues with certain songs (that are no longer sung) but that swearing was not a problem for me. I remember being 2 to a seat through the entirety of Bay 16 and there being a lot more noise.

Remember these days?

264328_237433882951376_121820541179378_921345_4921512_n.jpg
 

ballantyne

Well-Known Member
If it were inversely proportional, that line would be straight. What you have there is some kind of exponential or logarithmic relationship.

To the fight - waiting outside in Dane Drive, I observed those guys gathering and Blind Freddy could see that they had come for a fight. One proudly and pathetically sported a bloodied knuckle. Maybe they had been attracted by previous Squadron posturings on t'Internet?

There is a relationship between how Bay 16 conducts itself and these people, but not a direct one. Our swearing is a small part of a wrong impression that they get that we are lawlessness, we are violence. They see our posturing and want to take it a step further because they see themselves as warriors or outlaws. The only way to break this relationship would be for us to sit down and be quiet, which we are not going to do. What we are going to do is keep in mind what the limits are and work within them. We yell at the Squadron to f**k off but we do not wish to fight them and we'll just walk away from that. That line is very important.

This stuff has always cropped up during our successful periods, and as we go on to win the league and the ACL, we should have our eyes open to marginalising it. They like a rumble and will go where one looks likely. The logical progression is to pre-arranged battles with like-minded rivals.
 

LFCMariners

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure if I agree with your view on the 'No dickheads' policy. Melbourne Victory had the best supporters group in the League, but that was crippled because they were too lax. I'd rather see the YA build slowly on good grounds than skyrocket in size only to be torn apart by bad policing...
 

LFCMariners

Well-Known Member
I remember I raised issues with certain songs (that are no longer sung) but that swearing was not a problem for me. I remember being 2 to a seat through the entirety of Bay 16 and there being a lot more noise.

Remember these days?

264328_237433882951376_121820541179378_921345_4921512_n.jpg


I sure can- I'm bang in the middle of The Bay!
 

adz

Moderator
Staff member
This stuff has always cropped up during our successful periods, and as we go on to win the league and the ACL, we should have our eyes open to marginalising it. They like a rumble and will go where one looks likely. The logical progression is to pre-arranged battles with like-minded rivals.

just like in the movies!
 

awaba

Well-Known Member
I often hear that explanation but not yet aware of school kids in very large groups at school repetitively chanting offensive language in unison at the top of their voices.

just in general conversation then, its pretty common. Being able to loudly chant in unison would be just a bonus :D
 

adz

Moderator
Staff member
http://www.news.com.au/business/nuckin-futs-set-to-go-on-sale-after-lawyer-argues-f-word-wont-offend/story-e6frfm1i-1226247137467
A SNACK called Nuckin Futs will go on sale after a lawyer's successful argument that the word "f..." is a normal part of Australian speech and so cannot be deemed offensive under trade mark rules.

The trademark application for "Nuckin Futs" was at first rejected by the register as being scandalous and offensive due to its similarity to the phrase "f..king nuts".

The Trade Marks Examiner ruled that "Nuckin Futs" was an "obvious spoonerism" and deemed it ineligible for registration under section 42 of the Trade Marks Act.

Under the law such terms must be rejected if likely to be regarded as shameful, offensive or shocking to the ordinary person.

But solicitor Jamie White, Director of law firm Pod Legal, who submitted the application on behalf of his Gold Coast client, argued that "Nuckin Futs" was not offensive because it was commonplace in everyday Australian language.

In a five-page legal document, seen by news.com.au, which catalogues the history of controversial product names, Mr White argued the words "f..k" or "f..king" were "now part of the universal discourse of the ordinary Australian".

"We submit that whilst there may be a mere sentimental objection or mere distaste to NUCKIN FUTS, this is not a sufficient ground for rejection of the Trade Mark, particularly since a substantial number of people would not find the words shocking," the submission to the Examiner says.

Mr White told news.com.au: “Over the passage of time, certain words which may have caused major offence in earlier times would now be acceptable as trade marks in certain markets, namely, the Australian market.”

Almost a year after the initial application was rejected, the trademark examiner has agreed to accept the "Nuckin Futs" trademark - on the condition that the owner would not market it to kids.

Mr White assured the Examiner that the product, mostly comprising of edible nuts, would not be marketed to children as his client only intended to sell it in pubs, nightclubs and other entertainment venues.

The trade mark is due for registration in April 2012.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/business/nuckin-futs-set-to-go-on-sale-after-lawyer-argues-f-word-wont-offend/story-e6frfm1i-1226247137467#ixzz1jlPOXMJg

:popcorn:
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
Surely Fuddruckers would've had to get this sort of dispensation as well?

Just a thought - we should get Julia Gillard a Fuddruckers t-shirt.
 

Online statistics

Members online
30
Guests online
361
Total visitors
391

Forum statistics

Threads
6,827
Messages
400,289
Members
2,780
Latest member
Angry Ant
Top