ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
At this stage membership is crucial for the club, from what I understand it funds the back office and some. The Fox money goes to the cap so meant for the players (only that MC doesn’t use it all for what it’s intended). Other than sponsorship the next major funding stream is membership. The trust will take time and probably not really add anything this season due to timing. I’m all for the trust. I registered my interest, listened to the pod and completed the survey on the first day it came out.If you use it to attend games it is cheap admission. Only if you do not use it it becomes a donation to the Club or an investment where you may hope for a return, probably through goodwill or exposure if you are a business. But you get no way to control where the money is spent.
Professional sport has changed from what it was. In the past it was a community model. If you were a member of say a Rugby League Club you had a stake in the ownership. Every year there was an annual general meeting where you could stand for the board to be in a position to be part of the decision making body.
These days with private ownership only the owner has a say in the way things are run. Fans are now powerless unless they vote with their feet and that runs the distinct possibility of sending the Club into extinction.
If you want to have some control or say with the owner you either buy a share or make such a significant contribution that you get a say in how things are run. I am sure, even though he did not purchase a share, last year, Anton made a significant enough contribution to the Club that he ended up having a say in how things were run. If your financial contribution is large enough you will get a seat at the table.
This is why I see the proposed Trust as being so important in the future direction and success of this Club, whatever funding model proves to be most effective, which will be decided by the trustees. I see it as being even more important while we have a financially weak absent owner.
I am not a supporter nor an apologist for the owner, It makes no difference to me who owns the Club, except that a financially poor or tight owner makes the trust idea more important. I want the Club to prosper and I see the Trust as a way to move this Club forward with the fans having an increasingly important role in the Club's running.
It also allows the dream (at the stage) that someday we may have full ownership and control.
DoneSupporters Trust Update
There's a new survey out, make your voice heard and help shape the future of the trust.
Will be very interesting as to how that vote goes when the time comes.Another follow up survey from the team this morning. Very professional.
FWIW, I supported direct support of NPL or academy as just giving money to our current owner will only encourage him to spend even less and nothing will change
Voted for the option of a regular 6 month vote as I am expecting for priorities to change over time. While they were mostly great options, my preference is for infrastructure investment. The only one I am dead against is funding a marquee. Either way I am still on board.Another follow up survey from the team this morning. Very professional.
FWIW, I supported direct support of NPL or academy as just giving money to our current owner will only encourage him to spend even less and nothing will change
My exact thought process as well and let’s bring more gun young players on its our future and we need to do it right like we are now. MC needs to keep contributing as he is now and if the club does better in the long run then he benefits.Another follow up survey from the team this morning. Very professional.
FWIW, I supported direct support of NPL or academy as just giving money to our current owner will only encourage him to spend even less and nothing will change
I respect that and I’m very close to the same decision. Giving the trust the benefit of the doubt until I see how it’s all going to work but if I sniff help for MC where it’s not deserved I’ll wain in my enthusiasm very quickly.I still won’t buy into a trust whilst MC is in charge despite the last few months.
I think it was mentioned on the podcast too, that whatever money coming from this shouldn't be used as a cop-out for Mike (or anyone else), it should be in addition to whatever other money is coming in, not as a replacement for it.
This is correct, any of the trust money would be an addition to what the owner has already covered as a minimum. It was a very early stipulation that was made.
Mark is working hard in the background, I've read the draft and it's looking very good, definitely value for money if it can all get across the line. Quite a few things to iron out first.