dibo
Well-Known Member
@Shaun Mielekamp, if you read over these threads you'll see that I'm one of the most strident and consistent critics of taking games away.
I was really angry back when we did the whole NSO thing.
As you can see, I was most annoyed about the simple lack of communication.
The North Sydney venture in part annoyed me because I thought it was a wild goose chase for fans who may not even like the idea, and that there was very little in the way of rationale other than "this is going to save/make money", without even acknowledging the possibility that there might be any blowback.
The big thing that irks (and this goes back to the days of the Canberra games in 2009 or so) is the notion that the club needs to take games away because we're not big enough to stand on our own at home.
If it's just a case that we need a good tv deal and we're right after that (and the PFA deal guaranteeing 30% of new money is a good one because frankly I was worried it'd be a lot more than that!), then I'd love to hear the club say it out loud.
I appreciate you laying out the logic behind taking games elsewhere, and appreciate that there has been a more open line of communication in recent months.
I still hold concerns about the idea of taking games away simply because the more we do, the more we risk eroding the parochial support at home.
If you tell us though that there's a $150k turnaround on a game moved away to a 'community' venue, and you're gonna cap it at two, then I think people can at least rationalise that.
I was really angry back when we did the whole NSO thing.
The NSO argument boils down to "we have to do something, so why not try this?"
There are problems though.
We're not chumps. We're not stupid. We're not hicks. We know if there's a problem it needs to be fixed, but taking games to NSO is a conclusion in desperate need of an argument. I've taken particular issue with your posts AM, but it's not up to you to sell the idea, it's up to the club. If they're going to propose it seriously, they are going to need to lay out the reasons why or they are going to have a backlash.
- If we are to "see three games a season for 3 seasons and then an appraisal made", what appraisal is to be made unless this is exactly what you say it is not, i.e. "the first step in taking the Mariners away from the Central Coast"? If this isn't about a potential move, what exactly is being appraised? It presupposes that this will be a success (or else you wouldn't even try it), which leads me on to the next question (which are more rhetorical questions for the club, should they turn out to be serious)...
- What defines success here?
- What crowds do the NSO games have to draw for this to be a win?
- How many additional members do we need to get for this to be a win?
- What level of loss of support in Gosford is acceptable, or are we to assume that the Central Coast community will be unaffected or even boosted by taking games away?
- Why is this a better option than:
- Increased investment in publicity, marketing and community engagement?
- Increased investment in players (i.e. marquees)?
- Revising ticket prices to better target a 'sweet spot' - it's possible that a small reduction from $20 for regular games and $24 for premium matches might positively affect demand?
- If the gossip turns out to be true and we're considering taking games to places other than NSO (favourites seem to be trying Canberra again and even trying Tasmania seem to be the favourites), what could the possible benefits be?
- Lastly, if we're not doing enough right now on the Central Coast in terms of crowds, revenue, etc., what *do* we have to do to keep the club 100% on the Central Coast?
- How big do our crowds need to be?
- How much revenue do we need to drive?
- How much do we need to hit up in sponsorships?
- Can any of the three levels of government assist?
As you can see, I was most annoyed about the simple lack of communication.
The North Sydney venture in part annoyed me because I thought it was a wild goose chase for fans who may not even like the idea, and that there was very little in the way of rationale other than "this is going to save/make money", without even acknowledging the possibility that there might be any blowback.
The big thing that irks (and this goes back to the days of the Canberra games in 2009 or so) is the notion that the club needs to take games away because we're not big enough to stand on our own at home.
If it's just a case that we need a good tv deal and we're right after that (and the PFA deal guaranteeing 30% of new money is a good one because frankly I was worried it'd be a lot more than that!), then I'd love to hear the club say it out loud.
I appreciate you laying out the logic behind taking games elsewhere, and appreciate that there has been a more open line of communication in recent months.
I still hold concerns about the idea of taking games away simply because the more we do, the more we risk eroding the parochial support at home.
If you tell us though that there's a $150k turnaround on a game moved away to a 'community' venue, and you're gonna cap it at two, then I think people can at least rationalise that.