goingtoadisco said:
im sorry but some of this is pretty laughable. The canberra bid has formed partnerships with business and getting people to fork out 200 dollars to pay for a foundation membership is no easy task . i think there were what ? 500 or so mariners members in the first season and that included a season ticket for a game that was actualy going to be played.
is central coast tourism + the rta not funded by the goverment ?? thats two of our major sponsors that are funded through the goverment ?
Correction some of your comments...
1) Canberra bid has formed partnerships with business..... Two of those major business partners are associated with Ivan Slavich the bid leader. Others are also associated with the bidding partners.... I'm talking about genuine external business sponsors prepared to lay down their money if the franchise bid is accepted.
2)500 or so Mariners members or so in the first season.......The advertising of members for the first season of the Mariners did NOT happen until way after it was known that the Mariners would be accepted as one of the original franchisees. However, the Canberra bid is now taking money - or the promise of money, not sure which, even before they have been accepted by the FFA. The Mariners members knew when they would see their club play, Canberra's are not even sure that the FFA will even allow them into the A-League yet.
I have the opinion that it is wrong to ask people, average folks in the street, for money before they are even accepted into the comp.
If the coffers are so tight that the bid has to resort to asking for money from folks in the street just to mount the bid, there isn't a lot of substance behind the new club is there?
And what if the bid fails? Is there the promise of money being returned, or is the money taken on the understanding that it is for the bid, and that more money will be needed to become an actual member if they are accepted by the FFA. How is the current money being accounted for to ensure that no one is actually making money off the top before expenditure on bid related matters?
3) Central Coast Tourism & RTA are Govt. funded.
a) you say "Central Coast Tourism" . If you are referring to the shirt sponsor, that's actually Business Central Coast. The commercial business council for the area. Not the tourism people. The Business CC people has a main aim to provide jobs and promote businesses in the district. I think it is a partnership between businesses and local governments in the area. They may get state government and federal government grants too, to help them promote the area. They decided to put their name on the front of the shirt in order to advertise the business opportunities in this area, not weekends at Peppers at Terrigal.
b) you say "RTA". Is actually the Arrive Alive campaign, funded jointly by the Motor Accidents Authority and RTA. Both State Govt. authorities.
The MAA is funded by the CTP payments on car regos and
self funded as a result. It administers the CTP scheme and payments for compensation for injured third parties involved in motor accidents. The MAA is governed by a specific NSW Act. The RTA has a lot of it's revenue from the regos of vehicles and licence tests etc. but I think they still get an allocation from the State Budget.
The Arrive Alive campaign is aimed at younger drivers and trying to raise awareness amongst younger people about the dangers of speeding, drink driving etc. It is a public awareness campaign, so they have a large advertising and PR budget. They chose to get involved with the Mariners because of the stature of the team within the community and the ability of the club to publicise the Arrive Alive objectives through matchday advertising etc. Yes, Govt. owned, but it is a public awareness campaign and the wish to sponsor the Mariners is in line with the need to promote their goals.