The Salt Mine: Dig Deep, Stay Salty

[Spacks]

what generalisation ? you've twice now produced fraudulent documentation .
do you think you deserve a gold star for that ? jesus hates liars

I haven't "produced" any fraudulent documentation, I've linked to documentation that you've failed to produce any kind of argument that refutes the data in that documentation, you've just labelled the documentation as fraudulent because you don't like the author. It's really that simple.

If Jesus hates liars, you're going straight to hell to get burned for eternity. All you do is lie, manipulate, obfuscate and shit up every political discussion going. Heaven forbid if anyone has a difference of opinion to the resident f**ktard, TrueBeliever of his own nonsense.

 

[true believer]

I haven't "produced" any fraudulent documentation, I've linked to documentation that you've failed to produce any kind of argument that refutes the data in that documentation, you've just labelled the documentation as fraudulent because you don't like the author. It's really that simple.

project veritas and another koch funded climate denial group .
you are a docoumented bullshitter .

If Jesus hates liars, you're going straight to hell to get burned for eternity. All you do is lie, manipulate, obfuscate and shit up every political discussion going. Heaven forbid if anyone has a difference of opinion to the resident f**ktard, TrueBeliever of his own nonsense.

dante's says fraud gets you into the eighth circle of hell . have fun with the money changers at the temple.

 

[Spacks]

project veritas and another koch funded climate denial group .
you are a docoumented bullshitter .

I didn't produce the documents, I linked them and you've yet to prove the data is fraudulent.

dante's say fraud gets you into the eighth circle of hell . have fun with the money changers from the temple.

the money changers, is that a euphemism for 'da joooz' TB? Classy!

 

[true believer]

I didn't produce the documents, I linked them and you've yet to prove the data is fraudulent.

the money changers, is that a euphemism for 'da joooz' TB? Classy!

you forgot and and pooh pooh face

 

[Spacks]

you forgot and and pooh pooh face

Here's a wild concept, just because you don't like an author of a paper, doesn't make the data in that paper fraudulent.

Go through the data and prove it wrong. That's the scientific method.

 

[true believer]

Here's a wild concept, just because you don't like an author of a paper, doesn't make the data in that paper fraudulent.

Go through the data and prove it wrong. That's the scientific method.

no dickhead .you need to publish and submitt for peer review .
no matter how many times you double down and declare victory .

 

[true believer]

china trolling maga clothest queens
so good

 

[Ozhammer]

philpant is a miss spelling of flippant .still it best describes the the sort of avoidance enmployed by
your kind on isreal , brexit , fake antivax postings , fake climate change posting . obsessive homophiba etc

the male and female athlete thing is just another ,nothing to distract from the criminal activity .of
billionaires gaming the system and their marks always being outraged over bullshit

are you still making the claim . about climate that temputures where 2 degees hotter 2000 years ago than today or is that another subject you'd rather avoid ?

Whilst I know I am wasting my time even engaging with someone as clearly indoctrinated as you, it is interesting how you seem to ascribe various positions to me and others on this forum without evidence to support your rabid insinuations.

As to your repeated use of the term ‘your kind’ I am sure and certain that I would rather stay true to whatever my own values and beliefs are (and which are quite frankly none of your business) than be a slavish savant, which is how your posts make you come across.

Tell you what, how about you stop deflecting and state your position on the issue at hand, namely the appropriateness of biological males competing against biological females?

It might be interesting to see if you can form any sort of cogent argument, instead of throwing insults towards others around with gay abandon.

You will perhaps excuse me if I don’t hold my breath, whilst waiting for any sort of reasoned response.

 

[true believer]

which abrahamic

Whilst I know I am wasting my time even engaging with someone as clearly indoctrinated as you, it is interesting how you seem to ascribe various positions to me and others on this forum without evidence to support your rabid insinuations.

As to your repeated use of the term ‘your kind’ I am sure and certain that I would rather stay true to whatever my own values and beliefs are (and which are quite frankly none of your business) than be a slavish savant, which is how your posts make you come across.

Tell you what, how about you stop deflecting and state your position on the issue at hand, namely the appropriateness of biological males competing against biological females?

It might be interesting to see if you can form any sort of cogent argument, instead of throwing insults towards others around with gay abandon.

You will perhaps excuse me if I don’t hold my breath, whilst waiting for any sort of reasoned response.

please skip the motherhood issues . if ,as you have posted, clear false information .whether knowingly or not. then that's your issue and when you don't defend that position once shown to be erroneous.
then you have no credibility .
as for a non issue of male/female competion. i leave that up to the experts .as i do with vaccination ,climate change , engineering . i believe science not the cult of yahwah etc .
as for so called cross gender athletes there are a tiny amount of them .but right wing social media .funded by totalitain billionaries and governments ,trigger outrage over this .to stop marks like you from questioning what their stealing from you.
in the UK where this ruling was made . they've got brexit which has cost every family 3000 quid per annum .
what do you think is the pressing issue . whehter they can put food on the table or whether the trans kid down the road can play football on saturday ? any time .

the problem with "your values" is the fact you want to impose them on everybody else . while whinning
that some is questioning yours . that's hypocrisy 101

 

[Spacks]

And he still refuses to take a position on the question put to him twice.

🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍

 

[true believer]

Here's a wild concept, just because you don't like an author of a paper, doesn't make the data in that paper fraudulent.

Go through the data and prove it wrong. That's the scientific method.

look i know you have a problem that you can't "own the left"
this is typical strawman buffoonery.

when you post a paper it is peer reviewed and posted in a real journal like the lancet, scientific american etc

the burton of proof is "on you" your fraudulent climate paper was "peer review by anonymous"
so why are you lying spacks ? why

 

[true believer]

And he still refuses to take a position on the question put to him twice.

🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍

so whose right on participation the IBA or the IOC ? come on .
wombat had a moan about Imane Khelif last week . what is she/he ?

or more gaslighting ?

 

[Spacks]

so whose right on participation the IBA or the IOC ? come on .
wombat had a moan about Imane Khelif last week . what is she/he ?

or more gaslighting ?

"Tell you what, how about you stop deflecting and state your position on the issue at hand, namely the appropriateness of biological males competing against biological females?"

Answer Ozhammer's question from earlier in the thread.
Stop avoiding it.

 

[true believer]

"Tell you what, how about you stop deflecting and state your position on the issue at hand, namely the appropriateness of biological males competing against biological females?"

Answer Ozhammer's question from earlier in the thread.
Stop avoiding it.

i haven't avoid anything .don't you know the sex ? come on whats the answer ? it's your wedge .

 

[true believer]

look just declare victory and jog on . because you have absolutely nothing to offer as a discourse.

 

[Spacks]

are you still making the claim . about climate that temputures where 2 degees hotter 2000 years ago than today or is that another subject you'd rather avoid ?

who isn't making the claim that the earth was hotter in the past?

Even Climate.gov says so lol

What’s the hottest Earth’s ever been?

Earth’s hottest periods occurred before humans existed. Those ancient climates would have been like nothing our species has ever seen.

www.climate.gov

ANYWAY, ANSWER OZHAMMERS QUESTION

"Tell you what, how about you stop deflecting and state your position on the issue at hand, namely the appropriateness of biological males competing against biological females?"

 

[Spacks]

i haven't avoid anything .don't you know the sex ? come on whats the answer ? it's your wedge .

You've had multiple opportunities to state your opinion on the appropriateness of biological males competing again biological females, you have instead:

1. Never said whether you think it's appropiate or not
2. Continually redirected, accused or posed counter questions
3. Used language that deflects rather than state your position

 

[true believer]

who isn't making the claim that the earth was hotter in the past?

Even Climate.gov says so lol

What’s the hottest Earth’s ever been?

Earth’s hottest periods occurred before humans existed. Those ancient climates would have been like nothing our species has ever seen.

www.climate.gov

ANYWAY, ANSWER OZHAMMERS QUESTION

"Tell you what, how about you stop deflecting and state your position on the issue at hand, namely the appropriateness of biological males competing against biological females?"

really a scale of 65 million years . where is the exact spot of 2000 year ago ?
thats gotta your most pathetic effort yet

 

[true believer]

You've had multiple opportunities to state your opinion on the appropriateness of biological males competing again biological females, you have instead:

1. Never said whether you think it's appropiate or not
2. Continually redirected, accused or posed counter questions
3. Used language that deflects rather than state your position

right

 

[true believer]

You've had multiple opportunities to state your opinion on the appropriateness of biological males competing again biological females, you have instead:

1. Never said whether you think it's appropiate or not
2. Continually redirected, accused or posed counter questions
3. Used language that deflects rather than state your position

jesus said it would be better to have a mill stone around your neck and be thrown in the river .
than to offend one of these children . lookout boyo