The biggest issue relating to the amount of money spent on older and unproven players is simple, for the club to recruit they are required to spend more money on players because players and their agents believe they would be taking an image hit by coming here. For example, Shabow, Clisby, Simon and Weemac approx. cost 500k. Simon and Weemac possible wanted a final payday, Clisby has been through a number of clubs and Shawbow is unproven. I wouldn’t be surprised if these guys have the same agent.
And that creates a vicious cycle because those players do nothing to lift us up. It needs to be broken even if it causes some pain or is a big risk. If we spend an average of 75k on 17 players it leaves 1.6m in the cap floor for 5 quality foreigners (average 320k each). But maybe that's not realistic, im not sure. What about an average of 90k each for 17 locals? Surely that is doable? That gives 1.35m to spend on 5 quality foreigners (average 270k each). The real figure might land somewhere in the middle. I think we need at least 2.2m in well spend funds tied up in our starting XI and preferred subs.