ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
The top aussie talent will still want to play for the big boys. They get paid and will win.This could play in our hands this means clubs will be forced to play their foreign players and visa spots putting a squeeze on local players not wanting to be benched to make way for marquees . If the league continues the way it has it will stagnate.
Controversial but maybe this should of been posted in have we hit bottom yet
I don’t think the idea of selling a visa spot is the worst thing we could do as long as the money is invested in to the squad and not used to offset the losses. For example if our current visa budget was 1.2m (just a made up figure) we’re talking around 240k each on average. But if we can get another 300k for a spot we can spend 1.5m between 4 players at an average of 375k. Hard to say which would be more effective but possibly better fit with our youth orientation.
of course if MC was to use that to reduce his input it’s just disadvantaging us.
Wombat, I do not think MC manages to that level. I am pretty sure he would give the Club a budget and tell them to stay within it. End of his involvement.
In the past recruitment was then done in the main by the manager with who knows whose help with disastrous results.
The Central Coast Spoonies forever!
This could play in our hands this means clubs will be forced to play their foreign players and visa spots putting a squeeze on local players not wanting to be benched to make way for marquees . If the league continues the way it has it will stagnate.
They're a damn nice kit
I was thinking that there could be an opportunity for a tourist attraction.. The Spoonies
. maybe there is a line of merchandise there ... you know what they say 'if you can't laugh about it ...'
. i had been thinking up my own slogan based on recent discussions, maybe it could replace 'for the badge':
Central Coast Mariners
A*league
A*pathetic
I was thinking that there could be an opportunity for a tourist attraction.
The Big Spoon outside the stadium. Perhaps also naming rights. Spoon Stadium.
Options for merch too. Could get players to sign spoons after each match.
It's so sad that we are even contemplating this.
. seems to me like another bizarre marketing decision
. pink round where we predominantly wear black ... against a team coming from a country where their national teams are renown for wearing black ... but in this instance are likely to be wearing yellow (FFS)!
. a valiant effort to see a silver lining but personally i would rate this ideology somewhere between 'you must be f**king joking' and 'no f**king way' - glad you came to a more realistic closing statement. Charlesworth re-investing a windfall in the squad under those rules he wouldn't even be allowed to:
. in summary, it fits perfectly with our current predicament in the existing 'salary-capped' league and i think it is a f**king stupid idea
- currently fox gift him the salary cap (and then some i believe) ... yet he spends some of this money elsewhere
- how much 'extra' do you think another team will pay for another visa spot?
- assuming they pay their visa players double what they pay the locals - they would still have to do this
- if they then pay us extra for the privilege i assume it will only be a nominal amount (i.e. far less than the extra amount they spend on themselves)
- Charlesworth is likely to take the nominal amount regardless - because a little money is better than no money (refer to McGlinchey's original departure for a well known and disastrous example)
- the real benefit will not fall to us - it will fall to the other club's buying ability when it comes to local players, not the visa players:
- the salary cap will remain in place for the local players
- which means we have one more spot (or five) to fill with the same cap amount
- our opponents have just bought themselves (perhaps for a nominal amount) the ability to spend more on their fewer local players
apologies for the less than sophisticated vernacular
. i have already responded in a similar fashion ... and i apologise for all the consecutive posts ... but i think this is worth labouring because people so often don't grasp the real issue with the way salary cap exemptions impact other teams
. regardless of who gets squeezed out looking for minutes ... we will still be forced to find those willing to accept vastly lower wages. other than the very best local talent (the few that will be paid more to play alongside better foreign talent ... albeit against potentially weaker opposition), i struggle to see any advantage to the local game
- our buying power in the local market will be diminished as we are capped but have more spaces to fill
- 'their' buying power in the local market is improved as they have the same cap with less spaces to fill
I’d prefer they did the opposite. 2 visa spots only. And clubs contribute the rest of their visa spends to signing, training and marketing Australian talent. But hey my motivations are not purely winning or making money. So what the f**k do I know.