ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
greenpoint said:Nice one, marconigirl.
Are there any referees on this forum? I am wondering what somebody with a stronger grasp than I of the laws regarding handballs thinks about the Holland (in)decision.
Does the fact that a handball allegedly happened in the penalty area (rather than, say, out near the centre circle) influence a referee's decision whether or not to award a handball?
Lol, but we weren't talking about good referees ... and we talked about the influence it might have (not should have).Omni said:greenpoint said:Nice one, marconigirl.
Are there any referees on this forum? I am wondering what somebody with a stronger grasp than I of the laws regarding handballs thinks about the Holland (in)decision.
Does the fact that a handball allegedly happened in the penalty area (rather than, say, out near the centre circle) influence a referee's decision whether or not to award a handball?
With respect to the Dunkerly clan, I disagree with their conclusion.
A good referee makes the same decision any position on the park, the only thing that may change is what colour card you produce, apart from that the laws say nothing and as such you do nothing differently.
jaypee said:password said:in Australia the premiers plate means nothing (waits for ppl to say how it does in europe so it should here) we are in Australia and the champions are the one who wins the GF... and hutcho and co have never one it in 2 attempts!
FACT!
Umm and thats why its an automatic ACL spot - Tosser - you won - yes - but wait until your teams ripped apart in the next month - you'll finish last next year
(BTW - I know Stuart M is about to leave - forget what you read!!!)
kevrenor said:Lol, but we weren't talking about good referees ... and we talked about the influence it might have (not should have).Omni said:greenpoint said:Nice one, marconigirl.
Are there any referees on this forum? I am wondering what somebody with a stronger grasp than I of the laws regarding handballs thinks about the Holland (in)decision.
Does the fact that a handball allegedly happened in the penalty area (rather than, say, out near the centre circle) influence a referee's decision whether or not to award a handball?
With respect to the Dunkerly clan, I disagree with their conclusion.
A good referee makes the same decision any position on the park, the only thing that may change is what colour card you produce, apart from that the laws say nothing and as such you do nothing differently.
Accustoms said:What handball, didnt touch his hand. But it did touch a mariners hand on the way down to holland. Have a close look. Either way, if in doubt no dottie.
Also the 3 pens that were awarded the week before should never have been given.
What time was the corner taken...94 mins and how many seconds. There should never have been a corner in the first place as 93 mins was up.
Accustoms said:What handball, didnt touch his hand. But it did touch a mariners hand on the way down to holland. Have a close look. Either way, if in doubt no dottie.
Also the 3 pens that were awarded the week before should never have been given.
What time was the corner taken...94 mins and how many seconds. There should never have been a corner in the first place as 93 mins was up.
On 2.......Well doneskilbeck said:Accustoms said:What handball, didnt touch his hand. But it did touch a mariners hand on the way down to holland. Have a close look. Either way, if in doubt no dottie.
Also the 3 pens that were awarded the week before should never have been given.
What time was the corner taken...94 mins and how many seconds. There should never have been a corner in the first place as 93 mins was up.
your f**king kidding me on all 3 points arent you?
In terms of offside it is. In terms of, penalties or even whether or not the ball goes in the goal (you know, those close goal line decisions), the benefit goes to the defence. Basically, in either case, if you're no 100% sure of something, the decision is 'play on'tyson said:i may be wrong, but isnt it the benefit of the doubt for the attacking side? or is that different with penalties?
taylor said:
By David Davutovic
February 24, 2008 12:00am
THIS picture reveals just how close Newcastle's James Holland came to joining the Central Coast Mariners this season.
Holland, one of the brightest prospects in Australian soccer, already had his name and No21 printed on the back of the Mariners shirt for the 2007-08 season.
Note: He looks like a tool in that photo, wait a minute its coming to me: HE IS A TOOL!!!!ForzaJets said:
Note: 1x Champions shirt and 1x winners medal.
BJ said:Haha, and you think Joel Griffiths is cool.