Danny vukovic and his brain snaps

[Capn Gus Bloodbeard]

Jason, f*ck off with your logic mate, it has no place in this debate.

Forumer formerly known as Greenpole - but we played good for parts of the game..... I can hardly do a match review of that, can I??  

i need to fulfil my logic needs somehow - lord knows watching 'the dark knight' isn't doing it

 

[~Floss~]

Thanks for the clarification Gus. I'll be first to put my hand up and claim to have NO expertise whatsoever. I was aware that "Impeding" (or obstructing as I called it) was not a penalty, but was not aware that any form of contact - malicious or intentional or not - negates the "impeding" ruling and makes it a foul. I have no doubt that Danny conceded a penalty; my thought was that if the contact was significantly less malicious it may have constituted "Impeding Progress"... but apparently not.

Cheers for that.

 

[Capn Gus Bloodbeard]

good on you floss there used to be a foul called obstruction, which used to permit contact, so your interpretation isn't too far off the mark, just a few years behind anyway, i think bojic made the bigger blunder at this incident!

 

[serious14]

i need to fulfil my logic needs somehow - lord knows watching 'the dark knight' isn't doing it

So you move to Mexico, you come on here with your logic, AND you take a swipe at Batman whilst doing it??

Thin f*cking ice my southern friend, thin f*cking ice.

Greenpole - yeah yeah, I'll get 'round to it.  I'll watch the replay so I can be balanced (like that's any fun).  And what's this "interests of balance" shite, you just want something funny to read at work tomorrow. 

 

[marinersman]

It was a penalty and yellow. I can't believe some think it wasn't or maybe not.

So clear cut it wasn't funny.

 

[blastbum]

no, it was just a mistimed tackle

Just like his mistimed hi-five in the GF.  ;D

 

[soundsdifferent]

Great hit, Danny should play AFL.

haha
wats next maybe a king hit like big bas barry hall?

 

[~Floss~]

It was a penalty and yellow. I can't believe some think it wasn't or maybe not.

So clear cut it wasn't funny.

Absolutely... he smashed him. No doubt.

 

[Hagar the Horrible]

It sounds like he took too much on board when he was an understudy to Liam Reddy.

 

[Capn Gus Bloodbeard]

nah, he didn't stomp on him then eat him afterwards.

 

[ponno]

In Dannys defence - at least he saved the first attempt on the penalty ... he more then made up for his error at that point... sadly a certain someone wandering into the box gave Aloi$i a second chance....

 

[Rowdy]

Replay shows that 'someone' else on the other side of the 'D' was first into the box, only ever so slightly b4 Pedj.

Can't quite make out who it is? So entire blame can't be attributed to poor old Pedj, he was just the unfortunate, smack bang in front of Greens line of sight.

 

[ponno]

either way - it wasnt Dannys brain snap that cost the goal...

 

[clarence]

From what I've seen of the replay, Pedj made the most ground into the penalty box, and with quite a speed.

Maybe the ref viewed that as more deliberate than the other player who may have only encroached a bit? I know that isn't in the rules, but with all that was going on, Pedj's run may have caught the eye of the ref or maybe he was sledging a bit before that and came to the attention of the ref prior to the kick being taken? Usually I've seen the penalty retaken and a player cautioned, but not yellow carded.

TBF to Pedj though, he pwned Aloisi throughout the game, and partnered up well with Wilko.

 

[loyalist]

either way - it wasnt just Dannys brain snap that cost the goal...

fixed

 

[Bear]

Without reading any posts in this thread, and without seeing a replay, I thought it looked like Danny was jumping over his own defender, and the Sydney player didnt more when Danny jumped. Whats wrong with that? How is that a penalty?

 

[loyalist]

Without reading any posts in this thread, and without seeing a replay, I thought it looked like Danny was jumping over his own defender, and the Sydney player didnt more when Danny jumped. Whats wrong with that? How is that a penalty?

Should probably watch a replay as it was a definite penalty

 

[Bear]

Really? Fair enough. If thats the case, why jump thru the air at an opposition player when the ball is nowhere to be seen? Silly boy

 

[ponno]

Yep - was silly... it was just like a shoulder charge - ball no where to be seen....

 

[loyalist]

Really? Fair enough. If thats the case, why jump thru the air at an opposition player when the ball is nowhere to be seen? Silly boy

Yeah was pretty much a shoulder charge in the back