Coast Football Ramble Podcast

[true believer]

Did he try turning it off and on again?

Don't laugh thats a eleco's bread and butter

 

[Coast Football Ramble]

Hey guys, I will try to have the pod up today, it was scheduled for yesterday afternoon but computer issues and my busy life got in the way.
-Jimmy.

 

[Big Al]

Did he try turning it off and on again?

The problem is it works so often

 

[Wombat]

For me, only the volume of his voice makes me think of Foyle. Looks different, different accent, doesn't wear a hat and doesn't have Honeysuckle (yes, that really is her real first name) as his offsider. Wish he did though, she's a sort!

For me, only the volume of his voice makes me think of Foyle. Looks different, different accent, doesn't wear a hat and doesn't have Honeysuckle (yes, that really is her real first name) as his offsider. Wish he did though, she's a sort!

Yes. She is/was sexy. I think she has a drinking problem in real life.

 

[MagpieMariner]

Yes. She is/was sexy. I think she has a drinking problem in real life.

Bugger, I hope you're wrong.

 

[Wombat]

You could sort her out Maggy just keep her away from The Old Pub at Woy Woy!

 

[MagpieMariner]

I don't even go to the New Pub at Woy Woy.

 

[Coast Football Ramble]

We speak to Aiden O'Neill whilst he drinks a milkshake.
We discuss VAR, our draw with Melbourne City and our upcoming Adelaide game.

 

[true believer]

We speak to Aiden O'Neill whilst he drinks a milkshake.
We discuss VAR, our draw with Melbourne City and our upcoming Adelaide game.

Looking forward to this . I was feeling alot of man love during the first half of last weeks game .
It'll be a hard task to beat the gaffer's
Performance last week .

 

[Spacks]

what a larrikin

 

[Fadetoblack944]

Haha quality as usual. Sounds like a laid back dude

 

[pjennings]

“I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice banana milkshake.”

 

[Capn Gus Bloodbeard]

Haven't finished it, but to be 'that guy' for a moment- P105 of the Laws of the Game:

If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area and continues
holding inside the penalty area, the referee must award a penalty kick.

Think of it like applying advantage - the bigger advantage comes from awarding the foul at the end of the hold, not the start.
The same principle also applies if you hack somebody outside the box, they stumble, referees is waiting for a possible advantage, and you hack them again in the box (though that can be tricky if the ref doesn't consider the 2nd one to be a foul, even though that might be the one that brings them down).

 

[pjennings]

Haven't finished it, but to be 'that guy' for a moment- P105 of the Laws of the Game:

If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area and continues
holding inside the penalty area, the referee must award a penalty kick.

Think of it like applying advantage - the bigger advantage comes from awarding the foul at the end of the hold, not the start.
The same principle also applies if you hack somebody outside the box, they stumble, referees is waiting for a possible advantage, and you hack them again in the box (though that can be tricky if the ref doesn't consider the 2nd one to be a foul, even though that might be the one that brings them down).

You are being that guy. Fornaroli was holding Cisse off all game and was winning free kicks. The ref actually saw it this time with Fornaroli holding before Cisse had touched him. Fornaroli didn't get away with anything more after this incident either.

BTW - while p105 refers to the defender the same section earlier does not differentiate between defender and attacker. If a foul was given it should have been a free kick to us (given by the referee). The VAR couldn't rule for us as they can't adjudicate on fouls outside the area (except in the case of the defender fouling as you pointed out). .

 

[Capn Gus Bloodbeard]

You are being that guy. Fornaroli was holding Cisse off all game and was winning free kicks. The ref actually saw it this time with Fornaroli holding before Cisse had touched him. Fornaroli didn't get away with anything more after this incident either.

BTW - while p105 refers to the defender the same section earlier does not differentiate between defender and attacker. If a foul was given it should have been a free kick to us (given by the referee). The VAR couldn't rule for us as they can't adjudicate on fouls outside the area (except in the case of the defender fouling as you pointed out). .

You misinterpret. I'm not in any way trying to argue that it was a penalty (I said in the match thread that I thought the non-call was a good one)- just one of the guys thought that because the holding started outside the box it couldn't be a penalty. So, just pointing out that particular part of law.



The same would apply in reverse - say a defender and attacker are running back towards the goal, and the attacker is holding off the defender for 10 yards, if you eventually give the foul you go back to the start, not the end in this instance because that's the biggest advantage to the opponent.

 

[Forum Phoenix]

Great podcast.

Young player not interested in FIFA. Mind blown.

Great grounded kid. Could be a genuine rising star.

 

[nebakke]

Great podcast.

Young player not interested in FIFA. Mind blown.

Great grounded kid. Could be a genuine rising star.

Nobody asked him about PES though - he might just be religious.

 

[Forum Phoenix]

Also that mulvey interview last week was bloody fantastic.

Thanks team ramble.

 

[Coast Football Ramble]

We're recording tonight, any questions for the podcast team?

 

[Forum Phoenix]

Matty’s leadership and work rate - which really are stellar and in its own way crucial to rebuilding a team who has suffered from a lack of morale - VS issues with two strikers - we’re presently losing the midfield battle - and McCormack tucked in behind not up top where’s he’s hopefully more effective.