Good too see someone actually get properly punished for onceIsais got five games for his tackle on Farrell.
ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
Good too see someone actually get properly punished for onceIsais got five games for his tackle on Farrell.
Still waiting for Broxham to get done for his one on SS. Won't hold my breath.Juande deserved to be cited for his 3 tackles from behind
Where did you see this? More because I wanted to see if the Nux boys got anything for daring to take it to bling fc.Isais got five games for his tackle on Farrell.
I expect they'll appeal that, was clearly a very dangerous tackle though.Isais got five games for his tackle on Farrell.
Where did you see this? More because I wanted to see if the Nux boys got anything for daring to take it to bling fc.
Early season he was terrible but is getting better. As you know I'd always start Sasha but Tommy is improvingI was pondering on Aqualina, he's full of potential but he seems to be slightly off the pace. I'm hoping that'll improve with minutes and time. If he can put a little bit more pace into his game I think it's make a huge difference.
No lover of the guy but that’s harsh, especially as Faz saw the game out with no apparent ill effectsIsais got five games for his tackle on Farrell.
Not harsh at all. Perfect amount. It was one of the nastiest challenges I’ve seen for quite awhile. Have you seen the photo of it? Both feet, studs showing, left the ground and landing on both of fazz’s calves…. I get what you’re saying that yeah he didn’t break his legs etc. but that honestly doesn’t matter.No lover of the guy but that’s harsh, especially as Faz saw the game out with no apparent ill effects
My take on it was it was clumsy and poorly timed not deliberate and premeditated and Isais seemed genuinely apologetic to Faz. He is a spiky player for sure but isn’t a total dirtbag, like some others. Three games would have been sufficient in my opinion and if one of our players got five weeks, we would be spewing.Not harsh at all. Perfect amount. It was one of the nastiest challenges I’ve seen for quite awhile. Have you seen the photo of it? Both feet, studs showing, left the ground and landing on both of fazz’s calves…. I get what you’re saying that yeah he didn’t break his legs etc. but that honestly doesn’t matter.
isaias has always been a scumbag nasty c**t that fools the media and Adelaide fans with his childish voice and fake smile.
Blatant gaming and match fixing.Remember, Penha only got two weeks for a deliberate elbow to the back of Steele’s head.
I'm with you that it was not pre-meditated. Is 5 now the benchmark if you catch someone high with studs up? Topor-Stanley only got 3 for his studs-up foul on Kuol - his challenge was late and was intentionally trying to foul. One thing the FA are consistent on is there inconsistencyMy take on it was it was clumsy and poorly timed not deliberate and premeditated and Isais seemed genuinely apologetic to Faz. He is a spiked player for sure but isn’t a total
Dirtbag, like some others. Three games would have been sufficient in my opinion and if one of our players got five weeks, we would be spewing.
Remember, Penha only got two weeks for a deliberate elbow to the back of Steele’s head.
I was just about to mention it’s not his first red this season and that probably played a part.Haven’t seen the press release yet but I suspect/have heard it may be a 5 match suspension with 2 of those suspended, so 3 for now which I think is fair - considering this is his second red of the season already.
I dont know if I agree with that from the outset but he is getting grubbier as he ages and has to cover for age slowing his game. Not a good look.isaias has always been a scumbag nasty c**t that fools the media and Adelaide fans with his childish voice and fake smile.
He has form. This season he has had 2 yellows plus a game where he got another 2 and was sent off, then this straight red. Got another yellow in FFA cup. Last season he got 7 yellows including 1 second yellow.Is 5 now the benchmark if you catch someone high with studs up?
lolly got 2 weeks for a near leg break on DDS .who hasn't played since .My take on it was it was clumsy and poorly timed not deliberate and premeditated and Isais seemed genuinely apologetic to Faz. He is a spiked player for sure but isn’t a total
Dirtbag, like some others. Three games would have been sufficient in my opinion and if one of our players got five weeks, we would be spewing.
Remember, Penha only got two weeks for a deliberate elbow to the back of Steele’s head.
That wasnt even a tackle. More of an awkward follow through on a kick. 2 weeks for that was fine.lolly got 2 weeks for a near leg break on DDS .who hasn't played since .
Not sure I agree with that, DDS's leg bent with the very strong contact by Lolley. I think DDS has suffered a knee injury as a result due to his leg bending so much and probably stretched ligaments.That wasnt even a tackle. More of an awkward follow through on a kick. 2 weeks for that was fine.
It was somewhat unlucky with weird angles, reckless and ugly. I didn’t comment on force which there was obviously a bit because he was kicking the ball. DDS was coming in to make the tackle after a heavy touch but never got to the ball. Caught all of the follow through though.Not sure I agree with that, DDS's leg bent with the very strong contact by Lolley. I think DDS has suffered a knee injury as a result due to his leg bending so much and probably stretched ligaments.
oh, so were gonna decide suspension length on resulting injury now.....coolNo lover of the guy but that’s harsh, especially as Faz saw the game out with no apparent ill effects