ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
This is what I'm afraid of, not only expansion but the drum beat of promotion and relegation is only getting louder. What are we going to do when that inevitably happens? If we are $3 million in debt now, after three seasons of spending the absolute minimum, how will be able to compete year on year to stay up? We rely on the TV deal to cover the majority of our costs, if we get relegated and lose that how do we continue as a club? Even if somehow the promotion and relegation zealots are held at bay how does the club plan on adding anything to Australian football in general? Compared to other clubs bidding to be apart of the A-League we have next to no funds and are in $3 million debt, the COE isn't even ours! What are we offering Australian football apart from dragging down the quality of the league by spending the absolute minimum amount, when the TV deal covers our entire salary cap! If the business side of our football club cannot, at the very least, fund the operation of backroom staff and travel etc then how are we ever going to be a viable entity? If our three years of austerity have delivered nothing but a $3 million debt, how can we expect to remain one of the few professional football clubs in this country when there are about twenty other bids with much more financial muscle and a better business case. I want us to succeed and to do well, more than anything, but if this is our situation then how can we?
May you live in interesting times is a Chinese proverb used as a sledge on someone.Whilst I am not confident of the future I do not see reason to be as pessimistic as many here.
Do you remember the one think left in the bottom of Pandora's box? Hope.
Why do I retain hope?
1) The Club and the COE are not one and the same but they will exist as a mutualism. Both will benefit from the continued existence of the other. Having them as separate entities is insurance against one going bad and dragging the other down with it. I am sure that when (if) the COE starts making a profit this profit will flow to the Club, purely for the reason of making the Club more valuable. One does not make money from football clubs by taking money out. The money is made in capital gain.
2) If Mike could not see a capital gain in the future he would have sold for an amount to cut his losses when he had an offer rather than asking for a ridiculous amount.
Why am I not confident?
1) A lot of the forward projections for this season did not come to pass, due to the tv deal not delivering and a pretty poor A-league season overall.
2) If the FFA control of the A-league carries on and does not get separated I cannot see much new investment in clubs being generated. This will be when our club's licence may be sold and moved. I do not see Mike allowing it to be resumed.
At present I see Mike, other owners and possible investors in the A-League sitting on their hands until the future governance of the League is sorted. How hard you sit on your hands depends on how deep your pockets are. A good indication of this can be seen by looking at the table.
If change happens in a way the owners want I see hope for us and the League. It depends how long current owners are prepared to be patient.
If there is no change, I am pessimistic for both us and football in this country.
We are living in interesting times. (Chinese meaning)
I believe if you hold large assets you would hold them seperately in trust or limited liability company so if one goes down it doesn't hit all of them. But that is a semi educated guess. So they club don't specifically own the CoE but derive an income as a director or something like that? I would have thought the CoE is meant to be a cash cow for CCM like Leagues clubs are to NRL clubs without the social destruction they cause.Whilst I am not confident of the future I do not see reason to be as pessimistic as many here.
Do you remember the one think left in the bottom of Pandora's box? Hope.
Why do I retain hope?
1) The Club and the COE are not one and the same but they will exist as a mutualism. Both will benefit from the continued existence of the other. Having them as separate entities is insurance against one going bad and dragging the other down with it. I am sure that when (if) the COE starts making a profit this profit will flow to the Club, purely for the reason of making the Club more valuable. One does not make money from football clubs by taking money out. The money is made in capital gain.
2) If Mike could not see a capital gain in the future he would have sold for an amount to cut his losses when he had an offer rather than asking for a ridiculous amount.
Why am I not confident?
1) A lot of the forward projections for this season did not come to pass, due to the tv deal not delivering and a pretty poor A-league season overall.
2) If the FFA control of the A-league carries on and does not get separated I cannot see much new investment in clubs being generated. This will be when our club's licence may be sold and moved. I do not see Mike allowing it to be resumed.
At present I see Mike, other owners and possible investors in the A-League sitting on their hands until the future governance of the League is sorted. How hard you sit on your hands depends on how deep your pockets are. A good indication of this can be seen by looking at the table.
If change happens in a way the owners want I see hope for us and the League. It depends how long current owners are prepared to be patient.
If there is no change, I am pessimistic for both us and football in this country.
We are living in interesting times. (Chinese meaning)
I’m referring to the CoE that isn’t owned by the club. He could royally shaft the club in five years time and no one can do anything about it. His heart isn’t in the club at all, the Bakrie Group are the same and look at Roar over the last few seasons and their future is as bright as ours. Only he would know why he bailed the club out when he did. I bet it wasn’t because he was a Mariners fan.FFS of course MC is in it for his own benefit, as is every other football club owner in the world.
Do you spend money (apart from charities) for anyone else's benefit but your own?
He is not going to throw money away for my, your's or anyone else's benefit.
The whole aim is trying to match his benefit with ours.
It is his money and he can spend it how he likes.
He most definitely can, but where will that lead us a club? That's his prerogative and shouldn't people be allowed to criticize for potential flaws in that philosophy? I am grateful that we have the ability to have a club and that is largely thanks to him, but Charlesworth cannot be immune from criticism. Football is not a money making business, there are barely any clubs around the world that break even let alone make a profit, so isn't expecting to do so naive? In regards to world football we are actually rather well placed to be financially well managed we have a salary cap that ensures we do not have to spend extreme amounts to be anywhere close to competitive and a TV deal that fully covers our wages in the salary cap. If we cannot cover the other costs of our football club when the most expensive part of our business is almost entirely handed to us, how will we ever be the sort of club with a business model that Charlesworth wants?FFS of course MC is in it for his own benefit, as is every other football club owner in the world.
Do you spend money (apart from charities) for anyone else's benefit but your own?
He is not going to throw money away for my, your's or anyone else's benefit.
The whole aim is trying to match his benefit with ours.
It is his money and he can spend it how he likes.
I am surprised at this discussion. It has been common knowledge for many years that the COE and the football club were separate entities, with some commonality of ownership, mostly (but not totally) the same names, some differences in percentages. I am sure someone can dig up the details.
I have always assumed that the idea of the COE making money to benefit the football club would come from the owners of the COE to then afford to put more into the Club.
I am truly amazed that this is "new news" on this forum.
He most definitely can, but where will that lead us a club? That's his prerogative and shouldn't people be allowed to criticize for potential flaws in that philosophy? I am grateful that we have the ability to have a club and that is largely thanks to him, but Charlesworth cannot be immune from criticism. Football is not a money making business, there are barely any clubs around the world that break even let alone make a profit, so isn't expecting to do so naive? In regards to world football we are actually rather well placed to be financially well managed we have a salary cap that ensures we do not have to spend extreme amounts to be anywhere close to competitive and a TV deal that fully covers our wages in the salary cap. If we cannot cover the other costs of our football club when the most expensive part of our business is almost entirely handed to us, how will we ever be the sort of club with a business model that Charlesworth wants?
I am surprised at this discussion. It has been common knowledge for many years that the COE and the football club were separate entities, with some commonality of ownership, mostly (but not totally) the same names, some differences in percentages. I am sure someone can dig up the details.
I have always assumed that the idea of the COE making money to benefit the football club would come from the owners of the COE to then afford to put more into the Club.
I am truly amazed that this is "new news" on this forum.
Ray Gatt as the game ended...