Thanks for starting such a great conversation @Lexi - it’s brought up some really interesting points
We’ve established that the captaincy change was part of the original plan, but there’s still a lot to think about when it comes to what makes a good captain. eg. does anyone think the captaincy itself could be a burden that impacts a player’s performance? Could having that responsibility either motivate a player or weigh them down?
There’s also the question of what leadership on the field should look like. Should a captain be vocal and directing play, or is it more about leading through example and presence? And how much of that leadership should be obvious to us watching from the stands?
And what do people think about the idea of "earning" the captaincy? Should it always go to the most experienced or skilled player, or are there other factors to consider?
What’s everyone’s take on all this?
We’ve established that the captaincy change was part of the original plan, but there’s still a lot to think about when it comes to what makes a good captain. eg. does anyone think the captaincy itself could be a burden that impacts a player’s performance? Could having that responsibility either motivate a player or weigh them down?
There’s also the question of what leadership on the field should look like. Should a captain be vocal and directing play, or is it more about leading through example and presence? And how much of that leadership should be obvious to us watching from the stands?
And what do people think about the idea of "earning" the captaincy? Should it always go to the most experienced or skilled player, or are there other factors to consider?
What’s everyone’s take on all this?