midfielder
Well-Known Member
There pulling some major media too.. another mega article for a club not even in the league yet...
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/a-league/a-club-of-the-masses-rather-than-a-club-of-the-elite-new-team-will-ensure-a-new-rivalry-to-put-sydney-on-the-map-20100218-oj05.html
A club of the masses, rather than a club of the elite: new team will ensure a new rivalry to put Sydney on the map
MICHAEL COCKERILL
February 19, 2010
ANALYSIS
Whichever way you look at it, Sydney Rovers are going to be a breath of fresh air. For the A-League as a whole, because they will hopefully bring the heartland back into the game. For the culture of football, because three of the four directors are former pros, steeped in knowledge, and fired by enthusiasm. And not least, for Sydney. The rivalry between the Rovers and Sydney FC will, over time, bring the entire metropolitan area into its orbit. Australia's biggest city is also the country's biggest football city.
The weight of numbers has only rarely been reflected by the key measurements of ratings and spectators. From 2011, even the A-League's most trenchant critics - the 250,000 registered players of Sydney - will find the competition impossible to ignore.
So what can we expect, what should we expect, from the Rovers? Plenty, it seems. They'll be well capitalised from the start, which gives them the resources, and the momentum, to think big from the start. A $20 million centre of excellence. A strong membership base, perhaps second only to Melbourne Victory. A nice stadium, a list of blue-chip sponsors.
Most of all, a latent fan base which, rightly or wrongly, hasn't embraced the A-League. Some of them used to watch the old NSL clubs such as Sydney United, Marconi Stallions, Parramatta Eagles, or Blacktown City. They won't go to watch Sydney FC, partly because of the distance, and partly because they feel disenfranchised by the line drawn in the sand between ''old soccer'' and ''new football''. The Rovers are going to listen to their complaints, their wishes, their dreams, and act upon them. If they get that right, they've built their foundation. Fans who won't go to Moore Park will go to Parramatta, or Penrith, or Homebush Bay, or Campbelltown, as long as they're made to feel welcome.
The Rovers want to be the club of the west, not just geographically, but culturally. Multiculturalism doesn't scare them, it excites them. Ian Rowden, Charlie Yankos and Peter Tredinnick all played for ethnic clubs, so they know, and understand, the raison d'etre. It's now a question of harnessing it.
Whatever transpires, it's the natural divide between Sydney Rovers and Sydney FC that will take both clubs to another level. There's the natural competitive tension, on and off the field. There's the geographic divide between east and west. And there's the contrast between being a club of the elite, and a club of the masses. The great football derbies of the world are all built around a similar dynamic. In a generation, perhaps two, Sydney's derby can have it's own place in the pantheon. Neither the Rovers, nor the Sky Blues, should be scared by the challenge. It's their destiny.
In the meantime, Sydney FC will - quite rightly - be trying to make the most of their biggest advantage. A head start. Only in the past year have the Sky Blues accepted the inevitability of having to share the city. For a long time, they tried their hardest to fight it. It's one of the reasons Frank Lowy sold his majority stake in the club 18 months ago.
What's best for the game might not have been what suited the Sky Blues, so the Football Federation Australia boss made sure he couldn't be accused of a conflict of interest. Within no time, the Rovers were admitted, and only since then have Sydney FC moved to shore up their toehold in the west. The honeymoon will last another 16 months, and then all bets are off. Can't wait.