it was 10 Ourimbah vs 11 SEU
um...on that point. I dunno
Maybe it could allows us to change game unfairly?
I mean SEU would select a different formation from 4-3-3 (i think, might have been weird 4-4-2)
At end they may switch to 4-5-1 or 5-4-1 (due to use of subs)- but thats allowed!
IF they could choose new team, they could very well play no strikers (for a 15 min game)- 6-4 formation?
Us on the other hand, maybe 2 at the back? Our sidebacks, yes we have attackin LB, but not so much RB sometimes (we have 3 different players for that position)
It would be a bit like going on Fifa and using the challenge settings (being a cetain no. of goals down after 'x' amount of time).
yet again I think it was a CCF decision.
In theory their decision of EXACT teams >>> possibilities of new team selections
EDIT: I understand that formations will most likely be changed regardless...ie. pushing up defensive players (or pulling back attacking players for SEU)
um...on that point. I dunno
Maybe it could allows us to change game unfairly?
I mean SEU would select a different formation from 4-3-3 (i think, might have been weird 4-4-2)
At end they may switch to 4-5-1 or 5-4-1 (due to use of subs)- but thats allowed!
IF they could choose new team, they could very well play no strikers (for a 15 min game)- 6-4 formation?
Us on the other hand, maybe 2 at the back? Our sidebacks, yes we have attackin LB, but not so much RB sometimes (we have 3 different players for that position)
It would be a bit like going on Fifa and using the challenge settings (being a cetain no. of goals down after 'x' amount of time).
yet again I think it was a CCF decision.
In theory their decision of EXACT teams >>> possibilities of new team selections
EDIT: I understand that formations will most likely be changed regardless...ie. pushing up defensive players (or pulling back attacking players for SEU)