true believer
Well-Known Member
well the maga hall of fame is full of rapists ,closit queens and kiddie fiddler happy preachers .where else will I get my tentacle mp4 porn from bruh
so ok
ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
well the maga hall of fame is full of rapists ,closit queens and kiddie fiddler happy preachers .where else will I get my tentacle mp4 porn from bruh
tonight in brition people are eating 2 minute noodles for dinner .![]()
UK's top court rules legal definition of a woman refers to biological sex
The UK's Supreme Court has ruled the term 'woman' under equality law refers to biological sex, a decision hailed by some as clarifying legal rights but condemned by trans advocates as "another attack" on their rights.www.sbs.com.au
xDDDDD
- The court ruled a woman is someone born biologically female, excluding transgender women from the legal definition.
- The ruling confirms single-sex services like refuges, hospital wards and sports can lawfully exclude trans women.
- Trans rights campaigners said the ruling had worrying implications.
RARE UK W
Why couldn’t they just compete in their biologically compatible competition? 🤷🏼♂️and even more winning .the trans kid down the road, now wont be able to play football on saturday .
seeing as how you're a biologist .what is their biology ?Why couldn’t they just compete in their biologically compatible competition? 🤷🏼♂️
Seeing as you are now seeking a binary response (despite being happy death riding others who have sought this from you), I’ll bite and say whatever physical biology they were born with, as you are referring to trans athletes and not intersex.seeing as how you're a biologist .what is their biology ?
or are you only in it for the cruelty ?
so cruelty and no understanding .just a pliphant response. once questioned on your disregard ,Seeing as you are now seeking a binary response (despite being happy death riding others who have sought this from you), I’ll bite and say whatever physical biology they were born with, as you are referring to trans athletes and not intersex.
What a predictable response from you however and it’s a shame you don’t seem to have the same concern for those girls having to compete against biological males, so perhaps you have a solution to that conundrum?
but you don't read posts .your just the misunderstood joe hilabrand of ccmfansAhh, it looks like the discussion is on the English Supreme Court's ruling on gender/sex.
Finally a sensible ruling on the matter.
Disparaging those who dare to question trans dogma reminds me of the story of The Emperors New Clothes, where daring to state the obvious attracts the labelling of incompetent or stupid. {or in this case intolerance and stupidity]. It was left up to a child to point out the stupidity of those who went along with the myth.
There's no such thing as a trans child. Just a child misguided either by demons like you or a mother with Munchausens by proxy.The people who demonise trans kids ( to make themselves feel better because uncle Rupert wants you looking in the wrong direction) do know that's a UK ruling that will most likely get legislated away, right?
Right?
I'm waiting for some LNP cooker to talk about it and further f**k up Duttplug
Classic tb bullshit reply full of your standard buzzwords (although not sure what you mean by pilphant, so maybe you could educate me) but perhaps you could clarify exactly what you mean by ‘my kind’, as that seems a pretty non-inclusive term to throw at someone.so cruelty and no understanding .just a pliphant response. once questioned on your disregard ,
of what does fit your myopic view point and a strawman wedge .
your kind have a habit of making wild claims but never back up your claims .as you've done a repeatly .
on climate change , israel and it would seem now gender dysphoria.
Exactly who is demonising trans kids FFC, I hope you aren’t suggesting that’s what I was insinuating, when I simply asked about the issue of biological equity in sports.The people who demonise trans kids ( to make themselves feel better because uncle Rupert wants you looking in the wrong direction) do know that's a UK ruling that will most likely get legislated away, right?
Right?
I'm waiting for some LNP cooker to talk about it and further f**k up Duttplug
ha ha fundimentalist cooker . and they shall take up tiger snakes and wont be hurt .There's no such thing as a trans child. Just a child misguided either by demons like you or a mother with Munchausens by proxy.
Hey retard, respond to Ozhammer.ha ha fundimentalist cooker . and they shall take up tiger snakes and wont be hurt .
ooh so many voodoo ideas . say rapture preper 🐍🐍🐍
hay do you love the bit where god sends a bear to maul 42 children .Hey retard, respond to Ozhammer.
philpant is a miss spelling of flippant .still it best describes the the sort of avoidance enmployed byClassic tb bullshit reply full of your standard buzzwords (although not sure what you mean by pilphant, so maybe you could educate me) but perhaps you could clarify exactly what you mean by ‘my kind’, as that seems a pretty non-inclusive term to throw at someone.
Not sure why I ever expected anything different but hey ho. How about you answer my question about the equity of biological males competing against biological females, rather than dodging that issue entirely, or is that too difficult for you?
So let me get this straight, you admit “philpant” was just a misspelling of “flippant,” then immediately follow it up with a flippant generalisation about “my kind,” grouping together wildly unrelated topics like Israel, Brexit, climate change, and vaccine skepticism as if that somehow addresses the specific question Ozhammer asked. That’s retarded.philpant is a miss spelling of flippant .still it best describes the the sort of avoidance enmployed by
your kind on isreal , brexit , fake antivax postings , fake climate change posting . obsessive homophiba etc
the male and female athlete thing is just another ,nothing to distract from the criminal activity .of
billionaires gaming the system and their marks always being outraged over bullshit
are you still making the claim . about climate that temputures where 2 degees hotter 2000 years ago than today or is that another subject you'd rather avoid ?
what generalisation ? you've twice now produced fraudulent documentation .So let me get this straight, you admit “philpant” was just a misspelling of “flippant,” then immediately follow it up with a flippant generalisation about “my kind,” grouping together wildly unrelated topics like Israel, Brexit, climate change, and vaccine skepticism as if that somehow addresses the specific question Ozhammer asked. That’s retarded.