ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
Rowles for me. Modern day footballers should be able to play on their weaker foot and be able to be adaptable. No one is really worried if WeeMac or Connor plays on the right and the principal is the same. I think that is one position that we don't have a natural player, it's up to someone who potentially wouldn't otherwise to be in the match day squad to make it their own.
So help me out here ???
The choice is between Rowles ......... who can defend but no right foot ....... or
McGing who can’t defend but has a right foot. Assuming that Millar is not in the picture so assume he can’t defend or have a right foot ???
Eh wat ????
No one said McGing could defend just he was the best right footed imposter of a defender .
So help me out here ???
The choice is between Rowles ......... who can defend but no right foot ....... or
McGing who can’t defend but has a right foot. Assuming that Millar is not in the picture so assume he can’t defend or have a right foot ???
Eh wat ????
Best thing is Mulvey can see we don’t have good enough options in McGing and Millar.No Golec and Cisse wil be the Centre Backs. Both were looking good.
Agree and worst case Rowles keeps kicking it over the sideline. Izzo could do that from the middle and was aloud to have help from his hands.Rowles for me. Modern day footballers should be able to play on their weaker foot and be able to be adaptable. No one is really worried if WeeMac or Connor plays on the right and the principal is the same. I think that is one position that we don't have a natural player, it's up to someone who potentially wouldn't otherwise to be in the match day squad to make it their own.
I think the rational would be that Jake just isn't a RB. He can fill in if needs be for a few games but we need to be forward thinking and blood someone in that position for a season long stint. With Millar i think he has potential but isn't quite ready for a starting position and would be a potential liability. Hopefully Kyle does well and makes it his own and problem solved. Absolutely left field but i actually think Jordan Murray could do a decent job there, Duke like. He is a natural goal scorer though and hopefully will be a big asset off the bench.Agree and worst case Rowles keeps kicking it over the sideline. Izzo could do that from the middle and was aloud to have help from his hands.
Rowles is a much much better option than McGing even on his wrong side.
I hope
It's a problem area for sure, i would have loved us to get a specialist RB but all in all we have a great squad. It might take 5 or 6 games to get this right.I personally don't think Kye Rowles would suit right back, and while I'm more than happy to be proven wrong, I can't see it. His biggest struggle has been his positioning and that's in his preferred position, how is he going to go in a new one where it is especially important?
I personally don't think Kye Rowles would suit right back, and while I'm more than happy to be proven wrong, I can't see it. His biggest struggle has been his positioning and that's in his preferred position, how is he going to go in a new one where it is especially important?
3 players fighting for the same spot shows the depth is good. I would have to go with McGing over Rowles and Millar just because of the experience he now has. Jake has 74 A-League games under his belt compared to 13 for Rowles and of course 0 for Millar.
That's fair enough to say that McGing or Rowles aren't RB's and l would have liked to have seen a replacement for Roux as a specialist RB, our recruitment focused on other areas so we have to go with what we've already got. Millar was brought in as an RB/RW and thought he was ok in trial games but l am not sure he's ready yet. McGing is the one we have to go with imo.
3 players fighting for the same spot shows the depth is good. I would have to go with McGing over Rowles and Millar just because of the experience he now has. Jake has 74 A-League games under his belt compared to 13 for Rowles and of course 0 for Millar.
I could safely say that McGing would have not been capped in any other A-League in the past three seasons.
You can see that Mulvey is worried about the Frenchie on the left. Not the best solution but I can see where he is going with this. He also wants to reward Rowles for an excellent preseason.
There is also a small part of me (very small) that thinks this could move to three at the back at some stage. Maybe Wombat only saw the tactical session where we start with four at the back, or the tactical session where we move to four at the back if we are winning.
Bold move away to Brisbane and I don't think it will happen given the trial games, but it is a possibility.
im heading thereClub is doing the Football Grounds at Erina for a live site.
can you bring your own?Nah, only 1 food truck comes at HT if it's the same as the FFA Cup game.
I`d take McGing over Storm Roux version 2 any day, if we`re talking of shit....and 70 of them were shit.