dibo
Well-Known Member
Even with a salary cap, a haves and have nots divide is emerging.
Adelaide, Sydney, Central Coast and Newcastle have all made 3 finals series from 4. Adelaide's had two trips to the ACL plus the WCC. Sydney's been to the ACL and WCC.
Melbourne's made 2 and been to Asia, Queensland has now made 2.
Perth and Welly haven't made anything, they're not exactly raking in cash and their crowds are poor. If we ditched the salary cap we'd lose them both pretty quickly. I'd bet that NQ would essentially be stillborn, and GC would only survive as long as Clive Palmer's patience lasts. Ditto for Newcastle - substitute Con Constantine's name for Clive Palmer's.
We don't yet have sufficient non-football revenue for the cap to go, so we'd probably be either dead or close to (bleeding to death through being constantly uncompetitive) in no time.
So if you ditch the cap you can have viable clubs in probably 4 capitals. That's about it. f**k your dynasties off, there's no way that people are going to show up to watch four teams run up cricket scores against some also rans.
You think some matches are poor at the moment? Imagine if you take the bottom 10 players from each team at the moment and put them in four clubs, and then take the top 5 and put them in two clubs and the next 5 in the next two. You'd have Sydney and Melbourne pounding the bottom four constantly and usually beating Adelaide and Qld. The bottom four's matches amongst themselves could be contested for the James Robinson Trophy For Also Rans because that's all the silverware they'd ever have a chance of winning and that's the level of player they'd be getting. Imagine the dross you'd be served up then...
So you'd go from four usually pretty watchable matches a week to maybe a dozen a season. f**k that off for a joke.
Adelaide, Sydney, Central Coast and Newcastle have all made 3 finals series from 4. Adelaide's had two trips to the ACL plus the WCC. Sydney's been to the ACL and WCC.
Melbourne's made 2 and been to Asia, Queensland has now made 2.
Perth and Welly haven't made anything, they're not exactly raking in cash and their crowds are poor. If we ditched the salary cap we'd lose them both pretty quickly. I'd bet that NQ would essentially be stillborn, and GC would only survive as long as Clive Palmer's patience lasts. Ditto for Newcastle - substitute Con Constantine's name for Clive Palmer's.
We don't yet have sufficient non-football revenue for the cap to go, so we'd probably be either dead or close to (bleeding to death through being constantly uncompetitive) in no time.
So if you ditch the cap you can have viable clubs in probably 4 capitals. That's about it. f**k your dynasties off, there's no way that people are going to show up to watch four teams run up cricket scores against some also rans.
You think some matches are poor at the moment? Imagine if you take the bottom 10 players from each team at the moment and put them in four clubs, and then take the top 5 and put them in two clubs and the next 5 in the next two. You'd have Sydney and Melbourne pounding the bottom four constantly and usually beating Adelaide and Qld. The bottom four's matches amongst themselves could be contested for the James Robinson Trophy For Also Rans because that's all the silverware they'd ever have a chance of winning and that's the level of player they'd be getting. Imagine the dross you'd be served up then...
So you'd go from four usually pretty watchable matches a week to maybe a dozen a season. f**k that off for a joke.