dibo
Well-Known Member
poko said:dibo said:religious talk shouldn't be banned, and it isn't. *stirring* is not on.
Says you?
Am pretty sure the majority of your posts on this thread are stirring.
was certainly taking the piss before the thread actually developed into a discussion. apologies for the 'shoot first' approach, but it's not like the threadstarter does much other than take the piss and hijack things around here, so receiving a bit of his own shouldn't faze him too much.
on topic, i'd be very wary of making claims about what *most* or *a lot* of followers of any religion may do/believe. claims about what *some* adherents do or believe are much easier to back up, and prevent us getting into arguments about how many people believe what.
that said, what counts as 'the whole story that goes along with it'? does that include taking the bible as literally true? following papal encyclicals literally? how does a christian get around the disconnect between the messages of the old and new testament? does the old simply become the ten commandments and then a few stories that lay the ground for christ's gospel? etc...