David Votoupal
Well-Known Member
dibo said:David Votoupal said:Is it possible to strip the license from Palmer, sell to a willing buyer, but keep the name, players, staff, etc?
Yes. The licence, player contracts, club name etc. belong to the FFA. You buy (through your company - e.g. Mariners Leisure Pty.Ltd. or whatever it is for us) the right to operate it. It's like an expensive game of fantasy football.
If the FFA decides to can your licence or take it back from you, I think they *can* compensate you but may not, particularly when the licence is being revoked for what essentially amounts to breaking undertakings. It's breach of contract, so they simply pull out. As far as I can gather, they can operate it themselves or award the licence to a competitor at will.
Long story short - if the bloke who was running Gold Coast Galaxy agrees to step in, they could probably move the licence on tomorrow.
So a similar arrangement to MLS clubs?
Speaking of the MLS, keep in mind that "relocations" were nothing more than transferring the licence from one club to another- like the Cleveland Browns in the NFL, allowing a "new" Browns to be founded. This was the case with the San Jose Earthquakes when its license as transferred to the Houston Dynamo (originally meant to be Houston 1836 but we won't go into that), the Earthquakes returned last year.
What happened basically is that only the licence, player contracts, etc are transferred from one club to a new club, so the old club (in this case the Cleveland Browns and San Jose Earthquakes) kept all the history, honours, etc and could be reactivated at any time when a new license was granted.
Here's the other question- how do Constantine and Palmer compare to people like Manuel Ruiz de Lopera, Jesus Gil and various other dickheads to have presided over football clubs in Spain?