True, and we've all seen cases where the lines have clearly been drawn from the wrong position on the body.
But at least offside is mostly objective, rather than this YC/RC one.
The VAR protocol states:
- The VAR automatically ‘checks’ the TV camera footage for every potential or actual goal, penalty or direct red card decision/incident, or a case of mistaken identity, using different camera angles and replay speeds
I think we need to get past this idea of 'oh, the commentators weren't talking about VAR checks/there wasn't the logo on the screen so the VAR didn't actually look at it'. No, VAR looked at it and decided it didn't warrant intervention. People say it all the time with penalties and things 'oh, VAR didn't even look at it'. No, they did, just didn't think it warranted intervention.
When there's only 1 thing to look at...yes, VAR checked it. VAR will check many, many more things than we see as fans (which is part of the reason why they can have aVAR too).
Where I have no faith - and again, communication - is when you have multiple incidents in one play - eg and while they should, for instance, be reviewing the potential offside in the leadup to the penalty they're reviewing, I feel that's an area of concern - and again, communication is needed. Or when you have several potential incidents prior to a goal - we can assume they checked the buildup, but if you have 3 potential fouls, the VAR may only really have noticed and checked 2.
But, did I mention, communication?
I'm sure those on here who think it was offside would actually prefer to be proven wrong, rather than carrying the frustration of thinking we got screwed over another goal.
Though the broadcast editing this season is utterly atrocious, far, far worse than anything under Foxtel. Key incidents often don't get a second look by the broadcasters. I don't think that's conspiracy - it's just absolute incompetence.
We always had that problem to some extent with Foxtel, but it's increased tenfold now. It's like the editor doesn't know the sport at all.