midfielder
Well-Known Member
Were does it end (read the last few posts)... while we put our best foot forward at the WC where all the FIFA voting types are... Fairfax has gone on what I am not sure but someone has let the dogs off the leash ... and over nothing .. like we pay consultants to help us ......... like WTF ... who does not ...
So on top of the .... cough cough cough EEERRRRRRRRR investigation by SMH into FFA ... we have the ALP and Mr Rudd are evil ... paying consultants on getting results is bad ... We now have those two football lovers from the Fairfax stable one Mr Peter FITZSIMONS a football hater from way back... and Richard Hinds of AFL fame pretending to be a general sports person cough cough .
Peter first
Now for Mr Hinds....
So on top of the .... cough cough cough EEERRRRRRRRR investigation by SMH into FFA ... we have the ALP and Mr Rudd are evil ... paying consultants on getting results is bad ... We now have those two football lovers from the Fairfax stable one Mr Peter FITZSIMONS a football hater from way back... and Richard Hinds of AFL fame pretending to be a general sports person cough cough .
Peter first
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/australias-world-cup-bid-an-expensive-mistake-20100702-zu1s.html
Australia's World Cup bid an expensive mistake
PETER FITZSIMONS
July 3, 2010
So now we know. Not only did the Federal government put $45 million of taxpayer money towards a ludicrous attempt to get the World Cup of 2018 or 2022 here, but - as detailed in a Herald expose this week - two European lobbyists are to receive a staggering $11.37m of that money in fees and bonuses as part of a success fee. Even without success, the two will make about $5m! This is to go with the money spent to buy Paspaley pearl necklaces for the 24 wives of the executive committee members, plus pearl cufflinks, plus an all-expenses-paid trip for a team from the Caribbean to travel to Cyprus, and so on And all for what? On the chance that Australia, with a population of just 22 million, whose loyalty is divided between four football codes, in a time zone unsuitable for the biggest soccer markets, with no political clout at FIFA level, will win the bid? Please. We've already dropped out of the 2018 bid and this week Spiro Zavos reported in The Roar that "an informed source has told me that the FIFA president, Joseph S Blatter, Sepp Blatter to the punters, wants another term as presiding official of world football. But the chairman of Qatar's 2022 bid committee, His Excellency Sheikh Mohammed bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, has the numbers to prevent this. Qatar will win the hosting rights to the 2022 Football World Cup." And that will be $45m of our money down the tube on a hopeless bid, going to shonky practices that border on bribery at a time when grassroots sport across the country is crying out for resources. And it has been going on for years! Huge wads of federal and state money go to the sexy end of elite sport - see Olympics, rugby league and AFL particularly - while the grassroots gets bugger all. Going into this federal election, let us see the policies both the ALP and the Libs come up with to correct the balance, but the ALP government has already blown it on this one.
Now for Mr Hinds....
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/plenty-to-talk-about-in-weird-world-of-sport-20100702-zu17.html
Plenty to talk about in weird world of sport
RICHARD HINDS
July 3, 2010
Let's see. You've got an empty rectangle and the entire ridiculous, self-mocking, po-faced and occasionally uplifting world of professional sport with which to fill it. Like a three year-old with a lolly bag, some weeks it's hard to know where to start - snake, musk stick, Wizz Fizz, freckle?
Do we shake our heads about the seemingly excessive fees being paid to foreign lobbyists engaged to aid Australia's 2022 World Cup bid? Or, better still, shake our fists at those who consider the revelation of the use of taxpayer funds by the Herald to be an act of treachery?
''Mischievous and unhelpful'', in the words of FFA chief executive Ben Buckley, who might have been reading from the same statements issued when the AFL scandalously tried to protect its interests by ensuring it had venues available during a notional World Cup here. Splitters!
Of course, if there is nothing underhanded about these massive payments to foreign lobbyists, or the expensive trinkets lavished on visiting FIFA officials, then the World Cup bid committee has no reason to be concerned the taxpayer knows how their soccer dollar is being spent. Does it? Do we risk the lives of diabetics with the customary sugar-coated tribute to Roger Federer on the occasion of his first defeat before the final at Wimbledon since 2002? Lament that Saint Roger of Catgut's ''exquisite'', ''peerless'' and even ''gorgeous'' game might not ''adorn the grandest stages'' for much longer?
Or, in Rudd-esque spirit, do we swing the size 10s into the man by listing the reasons why the fallen Federer is a phoney, fraud and disgrace - which, at the time of writing, included very occasionally referring to himself in the third person, being three minutes late for a press conference at the 2005 Antwerp Indoors, those long pants he wore at Wimbledon, excessive blubbing and, ummm, we'll get back to you.
Do we pile into the debate about whether St Kilda tagger Steven Baker was hard done by after receiving a nine-week ban for four offences, none of which would have prompted an NRL referee to put whistle to lips - not if you consider Jarryd Hayne's headbutt of Billy Slater was not a punishable offence, presumably just some form of traditional rugby league greeting.
Or do we note the striking thing about Baker's suspension was not the striking - some of Anthony Mundine's imported punching bags have landed bigger blows. Nor was it the length of the ban. It was the reminder that the AFL has had to enact a law specifically designed to discourage - though, given Baker's earnest attempts to punch Geelong opponent Steve Johnson's broken hand, clearly not prevent - players from setting upon injured opponents like crazed wolves on a deer carcass.
In real-world terms, that is like deciding the straight-out murder law is not enough and we need to state specifically that pushing old ladies in front of speeding lorries is a no-no. Hard to shed a tear, then, for anyone callous or stupid enough to cross that line. Even if he cops a stray elbow in the eye from a feisty old biddy as he shoves her under the wheels.
Do we lament the underwhelming build-up to what should be one of Australian sports great events - Wednesday's State of Origin dead rubber? Or, given they are now giving away Blues jerseys with the purchase of 3D TVs at Harvey Norman, just check the NSW team list to see if we've got a game? Fans are being encouraged to take the trip to ANZ Stadium to watch NSW ''play for pride''. Which can't help but beg the question: What were they playing for in games one and two? AFL contracts?
Do we examine the anguish of those in the political loop - no one more than our own cricket correspondent Peter Roebuck - about the dark political posturing that led to John Howard being blackballed from the ICC presidency? Or, deep down, do we feel just slightly relieved we will likely be spared another tragic stint of guest commentary from Howard on ABC radio during the Ashes?
Do we urge FIFA to embrace the video technology that would ensure fair and unequivocal decisions, or remember how fair and unequivocal some of the decisions spat out by cricket's appeals system have been? Maybe best to suggest the old system came up with the wrong call but the right result - the elimination of a strangely unsympathetic English team by the oddly charismatic Germans.