bikinigirl
Well-Known Member
. ok i have been a bit busy to post but i wanted to add a couple of comments before discussion (rightly) moves on to the next game. bear in mind i know nothing about the guangzhou players or how they normally play
. i was not aware trent would not be playing and wonder whether he may have made a difference. not meaning to discount the contribution of zac ... but we'll never know. the second goal ... pedj was turned as his player snuck inside - trent may have read that and intercepted, pedj may have been expecting (hoping) for the same
. i believe lippi was well aware of mikey before the game ... he appeared to be up against their best defender and was often double-marked even when running with the ball
. monty was often covering pedj's RB position which i assume was the plan ... but i feel sometimes too deeply. i think bernie may have been caught out under similar circumstances which allowed their first goal. i doubt the way that they constantly played down that left side with muriqui pushing the offside line was a coincidence - he was quick and tricky. just as when they defended against a pedj attack ... he was generally forced back 'inside' - avoiding a cross, putting him on his wrong foot and throwing our shape
. matty proved he is still a very good 'keeper ... we haven't been able to see much of that this season - of course he is a great sweeper - but he saved our arse several times with good saves. their 'keeper on the other hand used his arse to save them ... but the chinese 'keepers are still fumblers and we must do better against that. we are not as clinical in front of goal ... but we often had shots on target with the ball spilling out. strictly speaking our strikers don't need to be 'world class' if they can capitalise on this stuff
. overall we done good ... but it only takes a couple of lapses in critical moments to ruin all the effort. whereas they possess a bit of extra class ... this is not always evident, but when it comes to the fore - that is the difference
. i can't believe their coaching hasn't received more praise (perhaps it is implied ... but names mean nothing to me). we did not under-perform but our key guys were targeted and our shape deliberately altered from what i saw ... we have been able to overcome this in the a-league - but they were better than that
. i was not aware trent would not be playing and wonder whether he may have made a difference. not meaning to discount the contribution of zac ... but we'll never know. the second goal ... pedj was turned as his player snuck inside - trent may have read that and intercepted, pedj may have been expecting (hoping) for the same
. i believe lippi was well aware of mikey before the game ... he appeared to be up against their best defender and was often double-marked even when running with the ball
. monty was often covering pedj's RB position which i assume was the plan ... but i feel sometimes too deeply. i think bernie may have been caught out under similar circumstances which allowed their first goal. i doubt the way that they constantly played down that left side with muriqui pushing the offside line was a coincidence - he was quick and tricky. just as when they defended against a pedj attack ... he was generally forced back 'inside' - avoiding a cross, putting him on his wrong foot and throwing our shape
. matty proved he is still a very good 'keeper ... we haven't been able to see much of that this season - of course he is a great sweeper - but he saved our arse several times with good saves. their 'keeper on the other hand used his arse to save them ... but the chinese 'keepers are still fumblers and we must do better against that. we are not as clinical in front of goal ... but we often had shots on target with the ball spilling out. strictly speaking our strikers don't need to be 'world class' if they can capitalise on this stuff
. overall we done good ... but it only takes a couple of lapses in critical moments to ruin all the effort. whereas they possess a bit of extra class ... this is not always evident, but when it comes to the fore - that is the difference
. i can't believe their coaching hasn't received more praise (perhaps it is implied ... but names mean nothing to me). we did not under-perform but our key guys were targeted and our shape deliberately altered from what i saw ... we have been able to overcome this in the a-league - but they were better than that