FFC Mariner
Well-Known Member
He isn't renewing his contract and planned to leave.Reports are he has signed elsewhere.
Won't be a Mariners player by the time this gets to court
Won't be a Mariners player by the time this gets to court
ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
Not to the clubs decision.It is relevant, either he's guilty or he not.
He won’t be missed.He isn't renewing his contract and planned to leave.Reports are he has signed elsewhere.
Won't be a Mariners player by the time this gets to court
It won't be decided before the end of the season so toodaloo, thanks for the goals.And if he's not, what then?
We might miss 15 goals.He won’t be missed.
Police don’t press charges without a decent amount of evidence, especially in matters of sexual assault of a high profile person.
You are correct, that in NSW the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty, however a simple accusation is not enough for a police officer to obtain an arrest warrant which judging from the information coming out, they have used a warrant.
Whether he is innocent or not. We shouldn’t take sides, championing him or saying he is innocent because we do not know.
Presumed innocent in a court of law ≠ innocent of malfeasances. Innocent in the eyes of the law is for protections to be in place for an accused persons. The public should not blindly accept that everyone is innocent, nor blindly view everyone is guilty. The public should shut the f**k up, like the club and let it run its course. During that time, stand him down. Should he be found not guilty, then the club will more than likely once again show their support
(depending on what else is found during the trail, ie. the way he communicates to women, threats ect.)
rooming with ruon?New rumour, signed by Rudan this afternoon who's promised to coach him on getting off
They definately do prosecute with minimal evidence. They now have an obligation to the supposed victims to persue in cases like this even if evidence is minimal. I see it regularly, I work in the court.
The presumption of innocence is an inherent right of all accused persons, to ignore that right is to allow the presumption of guilt to rule.
No one is championing that he is innocent, but he has to be afforded the basic right of innocence until judged..
Maybe this legalese debate doesn't need to happen in this thread ay
People would rather defend predators than believe victims and it will always be this way unfortunatelyHis rights are being upheld by our courts, I hardly see why we need people screaming from the rooftop “he’s innocent until proven guilty”. Because he is not, he is presumed innocent.
The police must pursue every single allegation to the point of pressing charges? Going to a judge, presenting evidence, convincing a judge to sign off on a warrant, then charging them, having a bail hearing, have pre trial hearings, discovery and so on? I feel like there’d be a lot of noise about this from almost everyone involved. Are you certain that is the case because that just seems absolutely outrageous and could be misunderstanding a ‘new world’ mindset where police officers actually have to take women seriously.
Like is there any information you can share where it states police and the courts must prosecute anyone and everyone accused of violence towards women regardless of the probability a crime took place?
People would rather defend predators than believe victims and it will always be this way unfortunately
If he's not guilty then he doesn't go to prison.And if he's not, what then?
If he's not guilty then he doesn't go to prison.
No one is saying either, f**k me, it's about not making a conclusion without knowing the story.
.
Didn’t say anyone wasNo one is saying either, f**k me, it's about not making a conclusion without knowing the story.
.
Didn’t say anyone was
People would rather defend predators than believe victims and it will always be this way unfortunately
No one in hereSo the statement was geared at no-one?