• Join ccmfans.net

    ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!

    If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.

    ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.

NRL struggling financially

FFC Mariner

Well-Known Member
'There's no blank cheque': Financial crisis crippling the NRL

http://www.livenews.com.au/Articles/2009/02/09/Theres_no_blank_cheque_Financial_crisis_crippling_the_NRL

'There's no blank cheque': Financial crisis crippling the NRL


As the Parramatta Eels battle to fend off privatisation claims, NRL supremo David Gallop has admitted the future of the code's 16 club structure is under threat.

The bitter forecast, Gallop revealed, is one the NRL has been dealing with for years - but as the worldwide financial crisis takes its toll on club's bottom lines, reality is biting.

And the truth hurts.

A Fairfax report has revealed that just 70% of leagues clubs posted a net profit in 2004. It's predicted only half that number will post a net profit in 2010.

41% of NRL clubs have labeled their financial situation as 'serious'.

The Sharks have been forced to borrow money to weather the off-season and honour salaries.

The Bulldogs are facing the very real prospect of entering the 2009 season without a major sponsor.

The salary cap will this year rise another $100,000 to $4.1 million with the NRL to increase its club grants by the same amount.

While the 'gap' between the grant and the salary cap is just a little over $500,000 - Gallop admits the costs involved in running a successful club is becoming more and more expensive - and the availability of sponsorship dollars becoming increasingly thin.

Parramatta CEO Denis Fitzgerald yesterday suggested the Eels would be open to offers of privatisation, while calling for NRL players to take a pay cut.

But Eels chairman Alan Overton has today declared he will not be accepting any offers from private investors.

"Privatisation has not been discussed at board level," Overton told Fairfax.

"The whole idea of the leagues club is to support the football club, and we will continue to support it as long as my backside sits on a seat there. These are difficult times, and we've got a few problems like everyone else out there, but we're not a poor club. Asset-wise, we're quite a wealthy club.

"What we have got to do is make sure we sort out our situation under the current circumstances, spend our money wisely and encourage our football club members to support the leagues club, which finances the football club, by coming to the leagues club more often."

But Gallop admits privatisation is an option clubs like the Eels must start exploring.

"I'm not opposed to it," Gallop explained to Alan Jones on Radio 2GB.

"I think we need to look carefully and make sure the people that are coming in are [credible].

"We all know football clubs are not places where you're looking for a profit. You're doing it out of love for your club, love for the game.

"In these times I don't think too many people are prepared to make that commitment.

"The state government poker machine tax, the impact of the smoking legislation... it put stress on a couple of years ago and it's an increasing stress."

And on players taking pay cuts?

"I dont think its time for talking about pay cuts. Its certainly a time for being sensible about growth."

Gallop insisted that no club's future is certain, but admitted the loss of any club could do irreparable damage to the game.
"It does a lot of damage certainly for the fans of the club which disappears, but I think it leads to a lot of disenchantment across the game if you lose a club.

"We've seen it happen in rugby league and it's a pretty painful thing.

"We've got a saturation of clubs across Sydney and I think that's important for us in terms of the competition we are in with other codes.

"We've got teams in important regional positions for us, so I dont think any club is expendable.

"Having said that, we cant be out there saying we've got a blank cheque, either."

But Gallop is adamant the game can survive.

"I dont think its all doom and gloom... I think rugby league can be something that people feel positive about in 2009 while they go through tough times. It can be a bit of an oasis in the desert."

You think he had his fingers crossed behind his back when he said that last comment?
 

Jesus

Jesus
Only 500k difference between the salary cap and nrl payouts? How could they complain about players wages when all they have to come up with is 500k?

I think the biggest issue is not just the nrl clubs, but the smaller clubs who are all funded by leagues clubs who can not afford the charity anymore.
 

Redline

Well-Known Member
Just can the whole comp.

Though Souths played at Redfern oval I saw on the news last night, the first time since 73 apparently lol.
 

Paolo

Well-Known Member
Countryhick said:
Just can the whole comp.

Though Souths played at Redfern oval I saw on the news last night, the first time since 73 apparently lol.
"The South Sydney Rabbitohs Rugby League Football Club played at Redfern Oval between 1948 and 1987."

bl to the news
 

MrCelery

Well-Known Member
Jesus said:
Only 500k difference between the salary cap and nrl payouts? How could they complain about players wages when all they have to come up with is 500k?

And that poses a risk to the A-league. NRL can pay players peanuts because the code is not a popular global game. NRL is the world's peak comp in the knuckle-dragger code, so they set the high water mark. Yet even they are struggling.

The A-League is competing in the global game for quality players and needs to be careful that we don't spend more than we can afford, and at the same time improve the league. Difficult challenge that during normal times. Very difficult in current times. Hopefully there will be a downwards correction in players wages, transfer fees, that will affect all levels, and will balance the fall off of sponsorship, etc.
 

FFC Mariner

Well-Known Member
Maybe it is a comment on their respective finances that only AFL Cricket and Football have kicked the tin towards the Vic bushfire appeal so far?

(I stand to be corrected however)
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
MrCelery said:
Jesus said:
Only 500k difference between the salary cap and nrl payouts? How could they complain about players wages when all they have to come up with is 500k?

And that poses a risk to the A-league. NRL can pay players peanuts because the code is not a popular global game. NRL is the world's peak comp in the knuckle-dragger code, so they set the high water mark. Yet even they are struggling.

not quite true. standard is the highest, but the pay is greater in the UK.
 

FFC Mariner

Well-Known Member
I wonder how much the inflationary effect of the stupid money being paid by clubs like the Chavs and Man City is filtering down to the wage demands in the lower divs?
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
the players that city and utd buy domestically provide the selling clubs (the leicesters et al of the world) with vast sums that they can then spunk on truly woeful players. wages and sale prices for all players rise, the economy of football grows (but is constrained by external money coming in - gates and sponsorship.

in the end the money filters through, but in the words of j.k. galbraith - the trickle down effect is the elegant theory that if you feed enough oats to the horse, enough will pass through to feed the sparrows too.
 

FFC Mariner

Well-Known Member
Dont knock the trickle down theory lol

Ronnie Reagan used it to justify tax cuts to the super rich on the grounds that they would spend it and it would eventually trickle down to the masses.
 

dibo

Well-Known Member
FFC Mariner said:
Dont knock the trickle down theory lol

Ronnie Reagan used it to justify tax cuts to the super rich on the grounds that they would spend it and it would eventually trickle down to the masses.

cue forza in 5, 4, 3, 2...

EDIT - bonus points if he can explain this graph

unit-35-inflation-and-unemployment_9.png
 

Paolo

Well-Known Member
dibo said:
FFC Mariner said:
Dont knock the trickle down theory lol

Ronnie Reagan used it to justify tax cuts to the super rich on the grounds that they would spend it and it would eventually trickle down to the masses.

cue forza in 5, 4, 3, 2...

EDIT - bonus points if he can explain this graph

unit-35-inflation-and-unemployment_9.png
im not forza but ill claim the bonus points anyway.

graph shows that an increase in tax doesnt necessarily equate to more tax revenue
 

~Floss~

Well-Known Member
I was gonna attempt that explanation if forza didn't reply, as I learnt all about the Laffer Curve from Feris Bueller's Day Off. (Also a bit about Voodoo Economics too)
 

The Umina Whiner

Active Member
Pffft. This issue gets wheeled out every few years. The clubs need to come up with creative ways to drive memberships, instead of relying on handouts from pokies.
 

Online statistics

Members online
13
Guests online
397
Total visitors
410

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
6,809
Messages
398,335
Members
2,765
Latest member
Sandrawaida
Top