To say Breeze is corrupt is just moronically one-eyed. Through most of the game wr probably benefitted the most from his ineptness.
Roar should've gotten a penalty in regulation time as one of our players was brought down from a fair challenge, then hacked the roar player from behind. You can all whinge about the fouls we didn't get, but we also got away with a bit too (remember that hefty shoulder charge in the first half?). Let's get over the Amini decision - that was a pretty minor foul that was missed, and the ref isn't going to get them all right. That one was completely inconsequential - and if for whatever reason he missed the first foul, Amini forced him to make the decision on the first (was I the only one who had a little smile at seeing this normally placid young lad fire the fark up?
)
Hutch with that studs up tackle to the back of the heel - I believe he was going for the ball (a dirty play like that isn't hutcho's style), but he should've been booked - and the ref could've easily given him a red. A few minutes later one of our other players probably should've been booked as well.
I'm not trying to deny that we got raped at the end (don't forget Theo coming off his line at the penalties), but to suggest that Breeze fixed the game is ridiculous.
If that was the case, do you REALLY think he's live it until 30 seconds to go to allow a foul to go unpunished and Roar to somehow slot the ball away?
No, if Breeze wanted BR to win the game, he would've put down that penalty agaisnt roar in the first half, and he would've sent Hutcho off - and there would've been more decisions go agaisnt us throughout the rest of the game.
If he wanted BR to win he would've made sure of it - and believe me, he could've done so in that game, rather than anticipate a miracle goal with 30 seconds to go to put it into penalties. Come on, use your brains people.
It always makes me laught when people whinge about the referees being biased - because 99% of the time the referee had ample opportunity to screw that team over if he really wanted (ie close calls in the penalty area), but didn't. This game was no different. Yes, we got raped in the end - but if he was corrupt he would've made sure of it before then. Yes, some decisions went against us earlier - but some went in our favour, and if he was corrupt he would've made sure they didn't. Without a doubt, we would've been 1 goal and 1 man down in regulation time if he was corrupt.
No, Breeze has always been useless. Nothing more.
Throughout the entire HAL he's been extremely proficient at getting the big decisions wrong - he's either way too quick with cards, or not enough. He seems to have so much uncertainty over his own game that he tends to overcompensate one way or the other, with the end result that he invariably gets the big calls wrong. This is something he's done for 6 seasons, and he's done that in manners that have both benefitted and harmed every single team.
He does have some strengths as a referee, but his unreliability on the big calls is his biggest weakness - and it's a critical one.
Personally, I still think he's better than that arrogant, gutless muppet with the ego of Tom Cruise - Mark Shield, but I was hoping somebody like Srebre Delovski was going to get the grand final. It's time to retire the old guard; they've simply never performed well in the HAL (but let's not just blame the referees - why are the coaches and inspectors letting them get away with it? I've met a FFA inspector who freely admits that most of the inspectors play favourites so their own state gets the glory of the top appointments. The referees are the ones with integrity - it's the ones controlling them that don't).
Let's not forget the assistants either - there were a lot of incorrect offside decisions, made by one in particular who was quite regularly out of position.
I was not happy when I saw Breeze take the field - I knew he wasn't able to handle a GF, and he proved that.
If that was the case he is incompetent. However, in his defence, Kwas was onside.
The case for incompetence/corruption
1) Bernie 1-on-1
2) Brisbane first goal
a) Free kick after Rose got the ball and was thru on goal after Franjic got tangled up should have been no foul.
B) From there a long ball brought down by an offside player
c) with the upper arm leads to their goal
Prosecution rests.
what ARE you talking about?